Book Chapter10.1007/978-3-031-33455-9_33
Prototyping an End-User User Interface for the Solid Application Interoperability Specification Under GDPR
5
TL;DR: In this article , the authors describe prototyping of the Solid application interoperability specification (INTEROP) and evaluate a dynamic user interface (UI) for the new Solid application access request and authorization extended with the Data Privacy Vocabulary.
read more
Abstract: This paper describes prototyping of the draft Solid application interoperability specification (INTEROP). We developed and evaluated a dynamic user interface (UI) for the new Solid application access request and authorization extended with the Data Privacy Vocabulary. Solid places responsibility on users to control their data. INTEROP adds new declarative access controls. Solid applications to date have provided few policy interfaces with high usability. GDPR controls on usage are rarely addressed. Implementation identified specification and Semantic Web tool issues and also in the understandability of declarative policies, a key concern under GDPR or data ethics best practices. The prototype was evaluated in a usability and task accuracy experiment, where the UI enabled users to create access and usage control policies with an accuracy of between 72 and 37%. Overall, the UI had a poor usability rating, with a median SUS (system usability scale) score of 37.67. Experimental participants were classified according to the Westin privacy scale to investigate the impact of user attitudes to privacy on the results. The paper discusses the findings of the study and their consequences for future data sovereignty access request and authorization UI designs.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) - Version 2
Harshvardhan J. Pandit,Beatriz Esteves,G. P. Krog,Paul Ryan,Delaram Golpayegani,Julian Flake +5 more
TL;DR: The DPV V2 is a standardized vocabulary for describing personal data processing, enabling interoperable and machine-readable representations. It fills a crucial niche in the state of the art and supports various regulatory and community initiatives.
5
Is Automated Consent in Solid GDPR-Compliant? An Approach for Obtaining Valid Consent with the Solid Protocol
Marc Florea,Beatriz Esteves +1 more
TL;DR: If, in the context of using personal data for biomedical research, consent can be expressed in advance, and how it can be obtained in this decentralized setting, is investigated.
3
Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) - Version 2
Harshvardhan J. Pandit,Beatriz Esteves,Georg Philip Krog,Paul Ryan,Delaram Golpayegani,Julian Flake +5 more
- 22 Apr 2024
TL;DR: The DPV V2 enables the creation of machine-readable representations for describing personal data processing and supports various regulatory and community initiatives.
`I Consent to These Terms’: A Legal and Technical Approach for Obtaining Valid Consent in Solid
Monica Florea,Beatriz Esteves +1 more
- 19 Jul 2023
TL;DR: The implementation of a policy layer in the Solid ecosystem to align with the GDPR and obtain valid consent for the processing of personal data in the context of biomedical research presents a number of challenges. These challenges include the need to ensure that consent is expressed in a clear and unambiguous manner, the matching of privacy preferences with requests for data, and the technical challenges of implementing such a policy layer.
1
AuthApp – Portable, Reusable Solid App for GDPR-Compliant Access Granting
Andreas Both,Thorsten Kastner,Dustin Yeboah,Christoph H.-J. Braun,Daniel Schraudner,Sebastian Schmid,Tobias Käfer,Andreas Harth +7 more
References
SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale
John Brooke
- 11 Jun 1996
TL;DR: This chapter describes the System Usability Scale (SUS) a reliable, low-cost usability scale that can be used for global assessments of systems usability.
12.3K
•Journal Article
The one number you need to grow.
TL;DR: By substituting a single question for the complex black box of the customer satisfaction survey, companies can actually put consumer survey results to use and focus employees on the task of stimulating growth.
2.5K
Privacy practices of Internet users: self-reports versus observed behavior
TL;DR: The application of the ethical/legal doctrine of informed consent to online transactions is questioned in the light of the evidence that users frequently do not consult privacy policies, as well as user interpretation of trust marks and interaction design.
468
Privacy Indexes: A Survey of Westin's Studies
Ponnurangam Kumaraguru,Lorrie Faith Cranor +1 more
- 01 Jan 2005
TL;DR: The methodology used each year to calculate the privacy indexes is reported on and some conclusions about which indexes can be used to infer privacy trends are drawn.
OOPS! (OntOlogy Pitfall Scanner!): An On-line Tool for Ontology Evaluation
TL;DR: A live catalogue of pitfalls that extends previous works on modeling errors with new pitfalls resulting from an empirical analysis of over 693 ontologies, and OOPS! (OntOlogy Pitfall Scanner!), a tool for detecting pitfalls in ontologies and targeted at newcomers and domain experts unfamiliar with description logics and ontology implementation languages.