Open AccessProceedings Article
Probabilistic Inference in Human Sensorimotor Processing
Konrad P. Kording,Daniel M. Wolpert +1 more
- 09 Dec 2003
- Vol. 16, pp 1327-1334
TL;DR: The results show that the CNS employs probabilistic models during sensorimotor learning even when the priors are multimodal, and subjects internally represent both the distribution of the task as well as their sensory uncertainty.
read more
Abstract: When we learn a new motor skill, we have to contend with both the variability inherent in our sensors and the task The sensory uncertainty can be reduced by using information about the distribution of previously experienced tasks Here we impose a distribution on a novel sensorimotor task and manipulate the variability of the sensory feedback We show that subjects internally represent both the distribution of the task as well as their sensory uncertainty Moreover, they combine these two sources of information in a way that is qualitatively predicted by optimal Bayesian processing We further analyze if the subjects can represent multimodal distributions such as mixtures of Gaussians The results show that the CNS employs probabilistic models during sensorimotor learning even when the priors are multimodal
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
•Posted Content
Hypothesis-based Belief Planning for Dexterous Grasping.
TL;DR: Experimental results show that the planner (IR3ne) improves grasp reliability and compensates for the pose uncertainty such that it doubles the proportion of grasps that succeed on a first attempt.
22
Variance misperception under skewed empirical noise statistics explains overconfidence in the visual periphery.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explored how noise estimation may critically depend on empirical noise statistics, which may differ across the visual field, with central noise distributed symmetrically but peripheral noise positively skewed.
8
Variance misperception under skewed empirical noise statistics explains overconfidence in the visual periphery
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explored how noise estimation may critically depend on empirical noise statistics which may differ across the visual field, with central noise distributed symmetrically but peripheral noise positively skewed.
8