Privacy and E-Learning: A Pending Task
33
TL;DR: This paper hypothesizes that there has been an ongoing process of technological evolution that leads to a loss of control over personal information, which makes it even more difficult to protect user confidentiality and ensuring privacy, that data surveillance has entered the world of education, and that the current legal frameworks are not enough to really protect the student’s personal information.
read more
Abstract: Most educational software programs use and gather personal information and metadata from students. Additionally, most of the educational software programs are no longer operated by the learning institutions but are run by third-party agencies. This means that in the decade since 2020, information about students is stored and handled outside premises and control of learning institutions. The personal information about students and their activity while they interact with learning management systems and online learning tools is increasingly in custody of cloud computing platforms, software-as-a-service providers, and learning tool vendors. There is an increasing will to use all the data and metadata from the activity of the students for research, to develop education management strategies, pedagogy approaches, and develop behavior control tools or learning tools informed by behavior analysis from learning analytics. Many times, these studies lack the ethical and moral perspective. In addition, there is an increasing number of cases in which this information has leaked or has been used in a shady way. Additionally, this information will be around for a long time, tied to the future digital profiles of the students whose data has been leaked. This paper hypothesizes that there has been an ongoing process of technological evolution that leads to a loss of control over personal information, which makes it even more difficult to protect user confidentiality and ensuring privacy, that data surveillance has entered the world of education, and that the current legal frameworks are not enough to really protect the student’s personal information. The paper analyzes how this situation came to pass, and why this is wrong. We conclude with some proposals to address it from its different root dimensions: technical, cultural, legal, and organizational.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: From Deceptive to Disruptive
Marc Alier Forment,Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,Jorge D. Camba +2 more
TL;DR: The need for implementing ethical practices in the use of GenAI models and ensuring that the technology is used to support and not replace the student's learning experience is highlighted.
31
Beyond Traditional Assessment: Exploring the Impact of Large Language Models on Grading Practices
Oluwole Fagbohun,Nwaamaka Pearl Iduwe,Mustapha Abdullahi,Adeseye Ifaturoti,Obinna Nwanna +4 more
- 05 Feb 2024
13
Assessing the Impact and Effectiveness of Cybersecurity Measures in e-Learning on Students and Educators: A Case Study
Ala'a Saeb Al-Sherideh,Khaled S. Maabreh,Majdi Maabreh,M. Asassfeh +3 more
TL;DR: In this paper , a sample study was presented to assess both the impact of the security framework on students' academic achievements and the student's satisfaction with the security countermeasures in an e-learning system.
Artificial Intelligence applied to teaching and learning processes
Carlos Alberto Gómez Cano,Ana Lucía Colala Troya +1 more
- 10 Dec 2023
TL;DR: As demonstrated, AI offers multiple benefits for education but requires careful implementation to maximize its advantages and mitigate potential risks.
10
In Search of Belonging Online: Achieving Equity through Transformative Professional Development
Michelle Pacansky-Brock,Michael Smedshammer,Kimberly Vincent-Layton +2 more
TL;DR: The Humanizing Online STEM Academy as mentioned in this paper ) is an open-shared online professional development program for minority students of color in the STEM field, where they are introduced to a model of humanized online teaching that centers belonging as a way to address equity gaps.
6
References
•Book
The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy
Cynthia Dwork,Aaron Roth +1 more
- 11 Aug 2014
TL;DR: The preponderance of this monograph is devoted to fundamental techniques for achieving differential privacy, and application of these techniques in creative combinations, using the query-release problem as an ongoing example.
Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization
TL;DR: An emergent logic of accumulation in the networked sphere, ‘surveillance capitalism,’ is described and its implications for ‘information civilization’ are considered and a distributed and largely uncontested new expression of power is christened: ‘Big Other.’
2.6K
Defining gamification: a service marketing perspective
Kai Huotari,Juho Hamari +1 more
- 03 Oct 2012
TL;DR: A new definition for gamification is proposed, which emphases the experiential nature of games and gamification, instead of the systemic understanding, and ties this definition to theory from service marketing because majority of gamification implementations aim towards goals of marketing, which brings to the discussion the notion of how customer / user is always ultimately the creator of value.
1.4K
Learning Analytics: Ethical Issues and Dilemmas
Sharon Slade,Paul Prinsloo +1 more
TL;DR: The field of learning analytics has the potential to enable higher education institutions to increase their understanding of their students' learning needs and to use that understanding to positively influence student learning and progression as discussed by the authors.
Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study
TL;DR: Using the Facebook group as a learning management system (LMS) in two courses for putting up announcements, sharing resources, organizing weekly tutorials and conducting online discussions at a teacher education institute in Singapore showed that students were basically satisfied with the affordances of Facebook.