Journal Article10.3736/JCIM20090918
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition)
David Moher,Alessandro Liberati,Alessandro Liberati,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Douglas G. Altman test,Gerd Antes,David C. Atkins,Virginia Barbour,N Barrowman,Jesse A. Berlin,J Clark,Mike Clarke,Mike Clarke,Deborah J. Cook,Roberto D'Amico,Roberto D'Amico,Jonathan J Deeks,Philip J. Devereaux,Kay Dickersin,M Egger,E Ernst,P C Gøtzsche,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,G Guyatt,Julian P T Higgins,Ioannidis Jpa.,Jos Kleijnen,Tom Lang,N Magrini,D McNamee,Lorenzo Moja,C Mulrow,M Napoli,A Oxman,B Pham,Drummond Rennie,Margaret Sampson,K F Schulz,P G Shekelle,David Tovey,Peter Tugwell +40 more
6.2K
TL;DR: Provide a structured summary including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings, systematic review registration number 2.
read more
Abstract: Provide a structured summary including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings, systematic review registration number 2 Structured summary
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
Andrea C. Tricco,Erin Lillie,Wasifa Zarin,Kelly K O'Brien,Heather Colquhoun,Danielle Levac,David Moher,Micah D J Peters,Tanya Horsley,Laura Weeks,Susanne Hempel,Elie A. Akl,Christine Chang,Jessie McGowan,Lesley A. Stewart,Lisa Hartling,Adrian Aldcroft,Michael G. Wilson,Chantelle Garritty,Simon Lewin,Christina Godfrey,Marilyn Macdonald,Etienne V. Langlois,Karla Soares-Weiser,Jo Moriarty,Tammy Clifford,Özge Tunçalp,Sharon E. Straus +27 more
TL;DR: A PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was needed to provide reporting guidance for this specific type of knowledge synthesis and was developed according to published guidance by the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of health Research) Network for the development of reporting guidelines.
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
David Moher,Larissa Shamseer,Mike Clarke,Davina Ghersi,Alessandro Liberati,Mark Petticrew,Paul G. Shekelle,Lesley A. Stewart +7 more
TL;DR: A reporting guideline is described, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), which consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review.
22.9K
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
TL;DR: The Consort 2010 Statement as discussed by the authors has been used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials and has been updated by Schulz et al. in 2010, based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience.
Depression and Quality of Life in Older Persons: A Review
TL;DR: A significant association between severity of depression and poorer QOL in older persons was found, and the association was found to be stable over time, regardless of which assessment instruments for QOL were applied.
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.
TL;DR: The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement as discussed by the authors is used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomized, controlled trials. Schulz and colleagues describe the latest version, CONSORT 2010, which updates the reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience.
References
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Alessandro Liberati,Douglas G. Altman test,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Peter C Gøtzsche,John P. A. Ioannidis,Mike Clarke,Mike Clarke,Philip J. Devereaux,Jos Kleijnen,David Moher +10 more
TL;DR: An Explanation and Elaboration of the PRISMA Statement is presented and updated guidelines for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses are presented.
•Journal Article
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Abstract: The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of preparing and maintaining Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions.
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Gordon H. Guyatt,Andrew D Oxman,Gunn Elisabeth Vist,Regina Kunz,Yngve Falck-Ytter,Pablo Alonso-Coello,Holger J. Schünemann +6 more
TL;DR: The advantages of the GRADE system are explored, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide and which is often praised for its high level of consistency.
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Alessandro Liberati,Douglas G. Altman test,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Peter C Gøtzsche,John P. A. Ioannidis,Mike Clarke,Philip J. Devereaux,Jos Kleijnen,David Moher +9 more
TL;DR: The meaning and rationale for each checklist item is explained, and an example of good reporting is included and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are included.
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
TL;DR: This report hopes this report will generate further thought about ways to improve the quality of reports of meta-analyses of RCTs and that interested readers, reviewers, researchers, and editors will use the QUOROM statement and generate ideas for its improvement.
5.1K