1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "Predictive action perception from explicit intention information in autism" ?
This paper showed that perceptual processes in the social domain may represent an especially notable example of a more general atypicality in ASD perception.
read more
2. What future works have the authors mentioned in the paper "Predictive action perception from explicit intention information in autism" ?
Indeed, their analysis of the relative weighting of both types of intention cues found that neurotypical participants weighted prior motion information more strongly than intention information, as expected given that current motion is the more reliable predictor of future position.. This could reflect either the use of kinematics to generate perceptual predictions about an action ’ s future course, or the perception of a coherent motion percept from the sequential motion frames, which requires predictive processes ( Kourtzi & Shiffrar, 1999 ; Yantis & Nakama, 1998 ), but which is compromised in ASD ( David et al., 2010 ).. This suggests a difficulty integrating the two sources of information, which is resolved by downweighting kinematic relative to explicit intention information ( Ernst & Banks, 2002 ; Hudson, Bach, et al., 2018 ; Zaki, 2013 ), although these results should be interpreted with caution due to the low sample sizes.. Higherlevel predictions generalize across space and time and become translated into action expectations further down the hierarchy, possibly via goal-to-kinematic transformations in the motor system ( Kilner, 2011 ), about what one will perceive, such as the assumption that others will behave in the most efficient way possible to achieve their goals ( Marsh, Pearson, Ropar, & Hamilton, 2015 ).
read more



