Platelet Glycoprotein Iib/Iiia Blockers During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention And As The Initial Medical Treatment Of Non-St Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Xavier Bosch,Jaume Marrugat,Juan Sanchis +2 more
23
TL;DR: IIb/IIIa blockers reduce mortality and myocardial infarction during percutaneous coronary intervention and non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, but increase severe bleeding risk, with variable efficacy in patients pre-treated with clopidogrel.
read more
Abstract: BackgroundDuring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS), the risk of acute vessel occlusion by thrombosis is high. IIb/IIIa blockers strongly inhibit platelet aggregation and may prevent mortality and myocardial infarction (MI). This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001, and previously updated in 2007.ObjectivesTo assess the effects and safety of IIb/IIIa blockers when administered during PCI, and as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS.Search strategyWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2009), and EMBASE (1980 to October 2009).Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials comparing intravenous IIb/IIIa blockers with placebo or usual care.Data collection and analysisTwo authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. We collected majorbleeding as adverse effect information from the trials. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for effect measures.Main resultsForty-eight trials involving 62,417 patients were included. During PCI, IIb/IIIa blockers decreased mortality at 30 days (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.95) and at six months (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.00). Death or MI was decreased both at 30 days (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.72), and at 6 months (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.81), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.59; absolute risk increase (ARI) 8.0 per 1000). The efficacy results were homogeneous for every endpoint according to the clinical condition of the patients, but were less marked for patients pre-treated with clopidogrel, especially in patients without ACS.As initial medical treatment of NSTEACS, IIb/IIIa blockers did not decrease mortality at 30 days (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03) or at six months (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.15), but slightly decreased death or MI at 30 days (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.99) and at six months (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.43; ARI 1.4 per 1000).
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
tDCS and Robotics on Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: Effect Modification by Stroke Duration and Type of Stroke.
Sofia Straudi,Felipe Fregni,Carlotta Martinuzzi,Claudia Pavarelli,Stefano Salvioli,Nino Basaglia +5 more
TL;DR: The additional use of bilateral tDCS to RAT seems to have a significant beneficial effect depending on the duration and type of stroke, and patients with chronic and subcortical stroke benefited more from the treatments than patients with acute and cortical stroke, who presented very small changes.
Structure-Guided Design of a High-Affinity Platelet Integrin αIIbβ3 Receptor Antagonist That Disrupts Mg2+ Binding to the MIDAS
Jieqing Zhu,Jieqing Zhu,Won-Seok Choi,Joshua G. McCoy,Andrea Negri,Jianghai Zhu,Sarasija Naini,Jihong Li,Min Shen,Wenwei Huang,Daniel W. Bougie,Mark Rasmussen,Richard H. Aster,Craig J. Thomas,Marta Filizola,Timothy A. Springer,Barry S. Coller +16 more
TL;DR: A new drug blocks platelet aggregation by interacting with the integrin receptor differently from current drugs that cause adverse side effects, and could have significant advantages over existing drugs, although this still needs to be tested directly in patients.
RUC-4: A Novel αIIbβ3 Antagonist for Prehospital Therapy of Myocardial Infarction
Jihong Li,Spandana Vootukuri,Yi Shang,Andrea Negri,Jian-kang Jiang,Mark A. Nedelman,Thomas G. Diacovo,Marta Filizola,Craig Thomas,Barry S. Coller +9 more
TL;DR: RUC-4 has favorable biochemical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, antithrombotic, and solubility properties as a prehospital therapy of myocardial infarction, but the possibility of increased bleeding with therapeutic doses remains to be evaluated.
76
Preclinical Studies of RUC-4, a Novel Platelet αIIbβ3 Antagonist, in Non-Human Primates and With Human Platelets.
Spandana Vootukuri,Jihong Li,Mark A. Nedelman,Craig J. Thomas,Jiang-Kang Jiang,Mariana Babayeva,Barry S. Coller +6 more
- 01 Jun 2019
TL;DR: The novel αIIbβ3 antagonist, RUC-4, for subcutaneously (SC)-administered first-point-of-medical-contact treatment for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has now progressed to formal preclinical toxicology studies.
Critical Analysis of Thrombocytopenia Associated With Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors and Potential Role of Zalunfiban, a Novel Small Molecule Glycoprotein Inhibitor, in Understanding the Mechanism(s)
Dean J. Kereiakes,Barry S. Coller +1 more
TL;DR: Evidence supports an immune basis for thrombocytopenia associated with the 2 small molecule GPIs and zalunfiban, a second‐generation subcutaneous small molecule GPI, does not induce the conformational changes; therefore, data from studies of zalunfiban will provide information on the contribution of the conformational changes to the development of GPI‐associated thrombocytopenia.
8
References
Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients
TL;DR: Aspirin (or another oral antiplatelet drug) is protective in most types of patient at increased risk of occlusive vascular events, including those with an acute myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke, unstable or stable angina, previous myocardian infarctions, stroke or cerebral ischaemia, peripheral arterial disease, or atrial fibrillation.
Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes
Lars Wallentin,Richard C. Becker,Andrzej Budaj,Christopher P. Cannon,Håkan Emanuelsson,Claes Held,Jay Horrow,Steen Husted,Stefan James,Hugo A. Katus,Kenneth W. Mahaffey,Benjamin M. Scirica,Allan M. Skene,Philippe Gabriel Steg,Robert F. Storey,Robert A. Harrington +15 more
TL;DR: In patients who have an acute coronary syndrome with or without ST-segment elevation, treatment with ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel significantly reduced the rate of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke without an increase in the rates of overall major bleeding but with an increase of non-procedure-related bleeding.
Prasugrel versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes
Stephen D. Wiviott,Eugene Braunwald,Carolyn H. McCabe,Gilles Montalescot,Witold Rużyłło,Shmuel Gottlieb,Franz Joseph Neumann,Diego Ardissino,Stefano De Servi,Sabina A. Murphy,Jeffrey S. Riesmeyer,Govinda Weerakkody,C. Michael Gibson,Elliott M. Antman +13 more
TL;DR: In patients with acute coronary syndromes with scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention, prasugrel therapy was associated with significantly reduced rates of ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, but with an increased risk of major bleeding, including fatal bleeding.
Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies
Julian P T Higgins,Douglas G. Altman test +1 more
- 22 Sep 2008
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a new algorithm called 1.8.1.1-2.0-1.8-1/2.8/1/1.
4.6K
Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)
William Wijns,Philippe Kolh,Nicolas Danchin,Volkmar Falk,Stefan James,Miodrag Ostojic,Massimo F. Piepoli,Charles Pirlet,José L. Pomar,Flavio Ribichini,Martin J. Schalij,Paul Sergeant,Patrick W. Serruys,Sigmund Silber,David P. Taggart +14 more
TL;DR: Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents summarize and evaluate all available evidence to assist physicians in selecting the best management strategy for an individual patient suffering from a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome and the risk–benefit ratio of diagnostic or therapeutic means.