Phase I clinical trial of fixed-dose rate infusional gemcitabine and dacarbazine in the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma, with assessment of gemcitabine triphosphate accumulation.
J. Buesa,Raquel Losa,Aida Fernández,Marta I. Sierra,Emilio Esteban,Ángela Díaz,Antonio Lopez-Pousa,Joaquin Fra +7 more
20
TL;DR: The authors set out to determine the dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) associated with a combination of gemcitabine and dacarbazine in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS) to obtain preliminary information on the activity of this combination.
read more
Abstract: BACKGROUND
In the current study, the authors set out to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) associated with a combination of gemcitabine and dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS), to obtain preliminary information on the activity of this combination, and to explore possible pharmacodynamic interactions between gemcitabine and DTIC.
METHODS
Every 2 weeks, 22 patients with refractory ASTS received fixed–dose rate gemcitabine (10 mg/m2/min) at escalating doses, which ranged from 800 mg/m2 to 2160 mg/m2, plus 500 mg/m2 DTIC. Plasma concentrations of gemcitabine and 2′,2′-difluorodeoxyuridine, along with gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), were evaluated during the course of treatment.
RESULTS
Grade 3 elevation of transaminase and γ-glutamyltransferase levels represented the DLT associated with the administration of 2160 mg/m2 gemcitabine plus 500 mg/m2 DTIC. This side effect was reversible, rather than cumulative, and did not exceed Grade 3 in its severity. The doses recommended for use in subsequent Phase II studies are 1800 mg/m2 gemcitabine (administered over the course of 3 hours) and 500 mg/m2 DTIC. Hematologic toxicity was moderate, and nonhematologic side effects that did not exceed Grade 2 in severity included the following: asthenia (75% of patients), fever (59%), nausea (52%), stomatitis (48%), anorexia (44%), emesis (40%), flulike syndrome (37%), and erythematous rash (26%). Alopecia was common. Intracellular dFdCTP levels, which were evaluated in 6 patients, reached a mean maximum value of 209 pmol per 106 cells (standard deviation, 59 pmol per 106 cells) at the conclusion of gemcitabine administration. DTIC had a limited effect on the elimination of dFdCTP from PBMCs. Objective responses were observed in 5 of the 19 patients who were evaluable for treatment efficacy.
CONCLUSIONS
The combination of gemcitabine and DTIC possesses an acceptable toxicity profile and may warrant further investigation in patients with ASTS. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Gemcitabine Plus Dacarbazine Versus Dacarbazine Alone in Patients With Previously Treated Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas Study
Xavier Garcia-del-Muro,Antonio Lopez-Pousa,Joan Maurel,Javier Martín,Javier Martinez-Trufero,Antonio Casado,Auxiliadora Gómez-España,Joaquin Fra,Josefina Cruz,Andres Poveda,Andrés Meana,Carlos Pericay,Ricardo Cubedo,Jordi Rubió,Ana de Juan,Nuria Lainez,Juan Antonio Carrasco,Raquel Andrés,J. Buesa +18 more
TL;DR: The combination of gemcitabine and DTIC is active and well tolerated in patients with STS, providing in this phase II randomized trial superior progression-free survival and overall survival than DTIC alone.
273
Oral administration of gemcitabine in patients with refractory tumors: a clinical and pharmacologic study.
Stephan A. Veltkamp,Robert S. Jansen,Sophie Callies,Dick Pluim,Carla Visseren-Grul,Hilde Rosing,Susanne Kloeker-Rhoades,Valerie Andre,Jos H. Beijnen,Christopher A. Slapak,Jan H.M. Schellens +10 more
TL;DR: Systemic exposure to oral gemcitabine was low due to extensive first-pass metabolism to dFdU, and hints of activity warrant further investigation of the concept of prolonged exposure to gem citabine.
72
Quantitative analysis of gemcitabine triphosphate in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells using weak anion-exchange liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry
Stephan A. Veltkamp,Michel J.X. Hillebrand,Hilde Rosing,Robert S. Jansen,Enaksha R Wickremsinhe,E. J. Perkins,Jan H.M. Schellens,Jan H.M. Schellens,Jos H. Beijnen,Jos H. Beijnen +9 more
TL;DR: This highly sensitive assay is capable of quantifying about 200-fold lower concentrations of dFdCTP in human PBMCs than currently available methods.
61
An open label, non-comparative phase II study of gemcitabine as salvage treatment for patients with pretreated adult type soft tissue sarcoma
Joerg T. Hartmann,Karin Oechsle,J. Huober,Andreas Jakob,M. Azemar,Marius Horger,Lothar Kanz,Carsten Bokemeyer +7 more
TL;DR: Considering response and progression-free rate as the primary endpoints for phase II trials in pretreated STS, gemcitabine has moderate efficacy.
54
Gemcitabine inhibits viability, growth, and metastasis of osteosarcoma cell lines.
Takashi Ando,Jiro Ichikawa,Atsushi Okamoto,Kachio Tasaka,Atsuhito Nakao,Atsuhito Nakao,Yoshiki Hamada +6 more
TL;DR: Gemcitabine had anti‐tumor activity on osteosarcoma cell lines both in vitro and in vivo, and this result would provide a cellular basis for application of gem citabine to patients with osteosARcoma.
36
References
Reporting results of cancer treatment.
TL;DR: Recommendations have been developed for standardized approaches to the recording of baseline data relating to the patient, the tumor, laboratory and radiologic data, the reporting of treatment, grading of acute and subacute toxicity, reporting of response, recurrence and disease‐free interval, and reporting results of therapy.
8.1K
•Journal Article
Gemcitabine : metabolism, mechanisms of action, and self-potentiation
TL;DR: The unique actions that gemcitabine metabolites exert on cellular regulatory processes serve to enhance the overall inhibitory activities on cell growth and is evidenced in very few other anticancer drugs.
790
A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine.
James L. Abbruzzese,R Grunewald,E A Weeks,D Gravel,T Adams,B Nowak,Shin Mineishi,P Tarassoff,W Satterlee,Martin N. Raber +9 more
TL;DR: The recommended dose for phase II clinical trials in solid tumors is 790 mg/m2/wk, and the dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, with thrombocytopenia and anemia quantitatively more important than granulocy topenia.
768
Gemcitabine and Docetaxel in Patients With Unresectable Leiomyosarcoma: Results of a Phase II Trial
Martee L. Hensley,Robert G. Maki,Ennapadam Venkatraman,Gennifer Geller,Meghan Lovegren,Carol Aghajanian,Paul Sabbatini,William P. Tong,Richard Barakat,David R. Spriggs +9 more
TL;DR: Gemcitabine plus docetaxel is tolerable and highly active in treated and untreated patients with LMS, and Hematologic toxicity was common, but neutropenic fever and bleeding events were rare.
701
Randomized Phase II Comparison of Dose-Intense Gemcitabine: Thirty-Minute Infusion and Fixed Dose Rate Infusion in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Margaret A. Tempero,William Plunkett,Veronique Ruiz van Haperen,John Hainsworth,Howard S. Hochster,Renato Lenzi,James L. Abbruzzese +6 more
TL;DR: Pharmacokinetic and clinical data in this trial supports the continued evaluation of the FDR infusion strategy with gemcitabine and demonstrates a two-fold increase in intracellular gem citabine triphosphate concentration in the FDR arm.
553
Related Papers (5)
[...]
[...]