1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "Penalty function-based joint diagonalization approach for convolutive blind separation of nonstationary sources" ?
Using this approach, not only can the degenerate solution induced by a null unmixing matrix and the effect of large errors within the elements of covariance matrices at low-frequency bins be automatically removed, but in addition, a unifying view to joint diagonalization with unitary or nonunitary constraint is provided.
read more
![Fig. 8. Overlearning observation by calculating the values (real part) of the off-diagonal elements of the cross-correlation matrices R (!; k) at each frequency bin. (a) Corresponding to the case without penalty function as in [4]. (b)–(d) Corresponding to the cases with penalty functions and penalty coefficients are 1, 0.1, and 0.01 respectively.](/figures/fig-8-overlearning-observation-by-calculating-the-values-2mkkc79n.png)
![Fig. 9. Comparison of the estimate error between the proposed method and the method in [4] using waveform simularity measurement (step size = 0:06).](/figures/fig-9-comparison-of-the-estimate-error-between-the-proposed-rp25uzo3.png)
![Fig. 5. Comparison of convergence performance of the new criterion (with penalty function constraint where 6= 0) and cross-power spectrum based off-diagonal criterion in [4] (without penalty function, where = 0).](/figures/fig-5-comparison-of-convergence-performance-of-the-new-2in1ha5m.png)
![Fig. 6. Comparison of the stable values and the required iteration numbers (to reach such stable values) between the new criterion and the conventional cross-power spectrum-based criterion. (a) Corresponding to the criterion in [4] with = 0. (b)–(g) Corresponding to the new criterion with penalty coefficient 6= 0.](/figures/fig-6-comparison-of-the-stable-values-and-the-required-1dv63rfl.png)

