Open AccessProceedings Article
PATE-GAN: Generating Synthetic Data with Differential Privacy Guarantees
James Jordon,Jinsung Yoon,Mihaela van der Schaar +2 more
- 27 Sep 2018
TL;DR: This paper investigates a method for ensuring (differential) privacy of the generator of the Generative Adversarial Nets (GAN) framework, and modifies the Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles (PATE) framework and applies it to GANs.
read more
Abstract: Machine learning has the potential to assist many communities in using the large datasets that are becoming more and more available. Unfortunately, much of that potential is not being realized because it would require sharing data in a way that compromises privacy. In this paper, we investigate a method for ensuring (differential) privacy of the generator of the Generative Adversarial Nets (GAN) framework. The resulting model can be used for generating synthetic data on which algorithms can be trained and validated, and on which competitions can be conducted, without compromising the privacy of the original dataset. Our method modifies the Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles (PATE) framework and applies it to GANs. Our modified framework (which we call PATE-GAN) allows us to tightly bound the influence of any individual sample on the model, resulting in tight differential privacy guarantees and thus an improved performance over models with the same guarantees. We also look at measuring the quality of synthetic data from a new angle; we assert that for the synthetic data to be useful for machine learning researchers, the relative performance of two algorithms (trained and tested) on the synthetic dataset should be the same as their relative performance (when trained and tested) on the original dataset. Our experiments, on various datasets, demonstrate that PATE-GAN consistently outperforms the stateof-the-art method with respect to this and other notions of synthetic data quality.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Privacy-Preserving Data Synthetisation for Secure Information Sharing
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors proposed PrivateSMOTE, a technique designed for competitive effectiveness in protecting cases at maximum risk of re-identification while requiring much less time and computational resources.
On the Challenges of Deploying Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data in the Enterprise
Lauren A. Arthur,Jason W Costello,James Edward Rea,Georgi Ganev +3 more
- 09 Jul 2023
TL;DR: In this paper , the challenges associated with deploying synthetic data, a subfield of Generative AI, are identified and systematized into five main groups: generation, infrastructure, governance, compliance, and adoption.
Differentially Private Synthetic Data with Private Density Estimation
Nikolija Bojkovic,Po‐Ling Loh +1 more
- 06 May 2024
TL;DR: Differential privacy-based synthetic data generation with improved accuracy and privacy guarantees for discrete and continuous distributions.
A Comparison of SynDiffix Multi-table versus Single-table Synthetic Data
TL;DR: SynDiffix is a multi-table synthetic data tool that generates more accurate data than single-table approaches for low-dimension tables, but is less accurate than the best single-table techniques for high-dimension tables.
Six Levels of Privacy: A Framework for Financial Synthetic Data
Tucker Balch,Vamsi K. Potluru,Deepak Paramanand,Manuela Veloso +3 more
TL;DR: Six Levels of Privacy framework categorizes Synthetic Data generation methods and their privacy protections.
References
Random Forests
Leo Breiman
- 01 Oct 2001
TL;DR: Internal estimates monitor error, strength, and correlation and these are used to show the response to increasing the number of features used in the forest, and are also applicable to regression.
Generative Adversarial Nets
Ian Goodfellow,Jean Pouget-Abadie,Mehdi Mirza,Bing Xu,David Warde-Farley,Sherjil Ozair,Aaron Courville,Yoshua Bengio +7 more
- 08 Dec 2014
TL;DR: A new framework for estimating generative models via an adversarial process, in which two models are simultaneously train: a generative model G that captures the data distribution and a discriminative model D that estimates the probability that a sample came from the training data rather than G.
Latent dirichlet allocation
TL;DR: This work proposes a generative model for text and other collections of discrete data that generalizes or improves on several previous models including naive Bayes/unigram, mixture of unigrams, and Hofmann's aspect model.
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine.
TL;DR: A general gradient descent boosting paradigm is developed for additive expansions based on any fitting criterion, and specific algorithms are presented for least-squares, least absolute deviation, and Huber-M loss functions for regression, and multiclass logistic likelihood for classification.
•Proceedings Article
Latent Dirichlet Allocation
David M. Blei,Andrew Y. Ng,Michael I. Jordan +2 more
- 03 Jan 2001
TL;DR: This paper proposed a generative model for text and other collections of discrete data that generalizes or improves on several previous models including naive Bayes/unigram, mixture of unigrams, and Hof-mann's aspect model, also known as probabilistic latent semantic indexing (pLSI).