Parameterized Distributed Algorithms
Ran Ben-Basat,Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi,Gregory Schwartzman +2 more
- 01 Jan 2019
- pp 16
TL;DR: In this article, the authors study the problem of finding a solution of size bounded by k in the LOCAL and CONGEST distributed computation models, and present lower bounds for the round complexity of solving parameterized problems in both models, together with optimal and near-optimal upper bounds.
read more
Abstract: In this work, we initiate a thorough study of graph optimization problems parameterized by the output size in the distributed setting. In such a problem, an algorithm decides whether a solution of size bounded by k exists and if so, it finds one. We study fundamental problems, including Minimum Vertex Cover (MVC), Maximum Independent Set (MaxIS), Maximum Matching (MaxM), and many others, in both the LOCAL and CONGEST distributed computation models. We present lower bounds for the round complexity of solving parameterized problems in both models, together with optimal and near-optimal upper bounds.
Our results extend beyond the scope of parameterized problems. We show that any LOCAL (1+epsilon)-approximation algorithm for the above problems must take Omega(epsilon^{-1}) rounds. Joined with the (epsilon^{-1}log n)^{O(1)} rounds algorithm of [Ghaffari et al., 2017] and the Omega (sqrt{(log n)/(log log n)}) lower bound of [Fabian Kuhn et al., 2016], the lower bounds match the upper bound up to polynomial factors in both parameters. We also show that our parameterized approach reduces the runtime of exact and approximate CONGEST algorithms for MVC and MaxM if the optimal solution is small, without knowing its size beforehand. Finally, we propose the first o(n^2) rounds CONGEST algorithms that approximate MVC within a factor strictly smaller than 2.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Adapting Local Sequential Algorithms to the Distributed Setting
Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi,Gregory Schwartzman +1 more
- 01 Jan 2018
TL;DR: This paper defines a robust family of local sequential algorithms which can be easily adapted to the distributed setting, and develops algorithms which have the same approximation guarantees as their sequential counterparts, up to a constant additive $\epsilon$ factor.
23
•Posted Content
Distributed local approximation algorithms for maximum matching in graphs and hypergraphs
TL;DR: A randomized and deterministic approximation algorithms in Linial's classic LOCAL model of distributed computing to find maximum-weight matchings in hypergraphs and an algorithm for hypergraph maximal matching, which is significantly faster than the algorithm of Ghaffari, Harris & Kuhn (2017).
21
Distributed Approximation on Power Graphs
Reuven Bar-Yehuda,Keren Censor-Hillel,Yannic Maus,Shreyas Pai,Sriram V. Pemmaraju +4 more
- 31 Jul 2020
TL;DR: This work investigates graph problems in the following setting: the authors are given a graph G and they are required to solve a problem on G2, and encounters two phenomena acting in opposing directions: slowdown due to congestion and speedup due to structural properties of G2.
•Posted Content
Parameterized Distributed Complexity Theory: A logical approach.
TL;DR: This work defines the levels of the Distributed-W-hierarchy and the Distributes that have first-order model-checking problems as their complete problems via suitable reductions and follows a logical approach that leads to a more robust theory.
3
•Posted Content
A Subquadratic-Time Distributed Algorithm for Exact Maximum Matching.
Naoki Kitamura,Taisuke Izumi +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a randomized O(s{max}−3/2}+log n-round algorithm for the CONGEST model was proposed, where s is the size of maximum matching.
2
References
Probabilistic computations: Toward a unified measure of complexity
Andrew Chi-Chin Yao
- 30 Sep 1977
TL;DR: Two approaches to the study of expected running time of algoritruns lead naturally to two different definitions of intrinsic complexity of a problem, which are the distributional complexity and the randomized complexity, respectively.
1.3K
Parameterized Complexity and Approximation Algorithms
TL;DR: The different ways parameterized complexity can be extended to approximation algorithms, survey results of this type and proposed directions for future research are discussed.
•Posted Content
Local Computation: Lower and Upper Bounds
TL;DR: In this article, the authors give a poly-logarithmic lower bound on the complexity of local computation for a large class of optimization problems including minimum vertex cover, minimum dominating set, maximum matching, maximal independent set, and maximal matching.
152
On the complexity of local distributed graph problems
Mohsen Ghaffari,Fabian Kuhn,Yannic Maus +2 more
- 19 Jun 2017
TL;DR: The result can be viewed as showing that the only obstacle to getting efficient determinstic algorithms in the LOCAL model is an efficient algorithm to approximately round fractional values into integer values.
148
•Posted Content
Near-Linear Lower Bounds for Distributed Distance Computations, Even in Sparse Networks
TL;DR: Recently, Frishknecht et al. as mentioned in this paper showed a near-linear lower bound on the round complexity of computing distances in the CONGEST model, which was previously known only for dense networks.
72