Pancreatits after endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography
TL;DR: This review provides a comprehensive, evidence-based assessment of published data on PEP and current suggestions for its avoidance and helps guide decisions regarding hospital admission and aggressive management.
read more
Abstract: Pancreatitis is the most common complication after endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP); the reported incidence of this complication varies from less than 1% to 40%, but a rate of 4%-8% is reported in most prospective studies involving non-selected patients. Differences in criteria for defining pancreatitis, methods of data collection, and patient populations (i.e. number of high-risk patients included in the published series) are factors that are likely to affect the varying rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) can range from a minor inconvenience with one or two days of added hospitalization with full recovery to a devastating illness with pancreatic necrosis, multiorgan failure, permanent disability, and even death. Although, most episodes of PEP are mild (about 90%), a small percentage of patients (about 10%) develop moderate or severe pancreatitis. In the past, PEP was often viewed as an unpredictable and unavoidable complication, with no realistic strategy for its avoidance. New data have aided in stratification of patients into PEP risk categories and new measures have been introduced to decrease the risk of PEP. As most ERCPs are performed on an outpatient basis, the majority of patients will not develop PEP and can be discharged. Alternatively, early detection of those patients who will go on to develop PEP can guide decisions regarding hospital admission and aggressive management. In the last decade, great efforts have been addressed toward prevention of this complication. Points of emphasis have included technical measures, pharmacological prophylaxis, and patient selection. This review provides a comprehensive, evidence-based assessment of published data on PEP and current suggestions for its avoidance.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
TL;DR: Female gender, previous pancreatitis, previous PEP, SOD, IPMN, difficult cannulation, EST, precut sphincterotomy and main pancreatic duct injection are risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis.
158
Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review for prevention and treatment
TL;DR: Most of studies in the literature showed that young age, female gender, absence of chronic pancreatitis, suspected Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, recurrent pancreatitis and history of previous PEP played a crucial role in posing high risks for PEP.
89
Double-balloon endoscopy: past, present, and future
Keijiro Sunada,Hironori Yamamoto +1 more
TL;DR: Double-balloon endoscopy was developed as a new technique for visualization of and intervention in the entire small intestine and is expected to contribute to the establishment of medical science of thesmall intestine and to research elucidating the mechanisms of small intestinal diseases.
Predictors of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prognostic model for early discharge.
Suzanne M. Jeurnink,Peter D. Siersema,Peter D. Siersema,Ewout W. Steyerberg,Jan Dees,Jan-Werner Poley,Jelle Haringsma,Ernst J. Kuipers +7 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors determine predictors of post-ERCP complications that could discriminate between patients at highest and lowest risk of post ERCP complications and develop a model that is able to identify patients that can safely be discharged shortly after ERCP.
Placement of prophylactic pancreatic stents to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in high-risk patients: A meta-analysis
TL;DR: Placement of prophylactic pancreatic stents may lower the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients and alleviate the severity of this condition.
43
References
Endoscopic balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for the removal of bile duct stones: a prospective randomised trial
TL;DR: Endoscopic balloon dilatation offers no significant advantage over the well established technique of endoscopic sphincterotomy for the removal of bile duct stones.
Mechanism of pancreatitis caused by ERCP
TL;DR: The hypothesis is that the lowering of pancreatic intraductal pressure after ES mitigates the severity of postprocedure pancreatitis.
•Journal Article
Antibiotic prophylaxis for gastrointestinal endoscopy.
TL;DR: The Endoscopy Unit have made all reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of the information on this site, but can take no responsibility for your use of it.
Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: pancreaticobiliary sphincterotomy with pancreatic stent placement has a lower rate of pancreatitis than biliary sphincterotomy alone.
TL;DR: In SOD patients, post-ERCP pancreatitis rates remain high, but have improved with the addition of combined pancreaticobiliary sphincter therapy.
Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the management of common bile duct stones: experience of 226 cases.
Yutaka Komatsu,Takao Kawabe,Nobuo Toda,Makoto Ohashi,M. Isayama,Keisuke Tateishi,Shinpei Sato,Y. Koike,Michiko Yamagata,Motohisa Tada,Yasushi Shiratori,H. Yamada,M. Ihori,Tateo Kawase,Masao Omata +14 more
TL;DR: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of common bile duct stones, even in high-risk patients.
Related Papers (5)
[...]