Journal Article10.2307/SYSBIO/34.2.174
Orthogenesis and Evolution
John R. Grehan,Ruth Ainsworth +1 more
TL;DR: The panbiogeographic use of orthogenesis is compatible with the origin of the term as presented by Haacke and Eimer, and terms such as "constraints," "bias," and "potential" may imply orthogenesis.
read more
Abstract: -In the panbiogeographic evolutionary synthesis, orthogenesis is referred to as a process which involves an inherent tendency to vary in certain directions, as ancestors vicariate or break apart into descendants. Orthogenesis has origins in the studies of form, but is given a biogeographic perspective in panbiogeography. The panbiogeographic use of orthogenesis is compatible with the origin of the term as presented by Haacke and Eimer. Misinterpretations of orthogenesis describing it as mystical, teleological and linear are invalid. The orthogenetic aspect of evolution was recognized by Darwin as "laws of growth," but was neglected in favor of natural selection. Although an internal component to evolution is recognized by contemporary biologists, it is often considered to be secondary to natural selection. Where recognition is given to an internal tendency for evolution to proceed without requiring the action of natural selection, terms such as "constraints," "bias," and "potential" may imply orthogenesis. [Orthogenesis; panbiogeography; biogeography; vicariism; evolution; dispersal.] The orthogenetic idea that evolution has its own inexorable internal momentum forcing lineages beyond the limits of natural selection is obviously absurd [Dawkins and Krebs, 1979:507]. In due time all theories defending orthogenesis were refuted [Mayr, 1982a:530]. I can accordingly understand that some naturalists may wax "religious," and speak of orthogenesis in mystical terms; others indulge in philosophical abstractions in regard also of the same orthogenesisions in regard also of the same orthogenesis etc. Naturally, I do not see the need for my part to follow in their company, but I do believe that, whatever we intend and believe, we had all better be clear about the substances here in play [Croizat,
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution.
TL;DR: Phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequence data from the plastic rbcL gene indicates that both carnivory and stereotyped trap forms have arisen independently in different lineages of angiosperms, and demonstrates that flypaper traps share close common ancestry with all other trap forms.
307
The recognition and evaluation of homoplasy in primate and human evolution.
TL;DR: More rigorous empirical studies are necessary to discover what, if any, generalizations can be made about the likelihood of homoplasy in different types of characters, as this review shows that these generalizations are usually based on theory, and contradictory expectations can be developed under different theoretical models.
112
•Book
The Evolution of Darwinism: Selection, Adaptation and Progress in Evolutionary Biology
Timothy Shanahan
- 15 Mar 2004
TL;DR: This book discusses Darwin and natural selection, adaptation, progress, and the group selection controversy as well as human physical and mental evolution.
Interacting evolutionary constraints in pelvic reduction of threespine sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus (Pisces, Gasterosteidae)
TL;DR: Pelvic reduction apparently has been a recurrent phenomenon in Gasterosteus since at least the early Pliocene, but it has not resulted in evolution of a separate lineage of ‘pelvicless’ sticklebacks because such populations are restricted to lakes, which are ephemeral over evolutionary time.
99
References
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors criticise the adaptationist program for its inability to distinguish current utility from reasons for origin (male tyrannosaurs may have used their diminutive front legs to titillate female partners, but this will not explain why they got so small).
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Stephen Jay Gould,Richard C Lewontin,Eliot Sober,Cambridge Mit Press +3 more
- 01 Jan 1984
TL;DR: The adaptationist programme is faulted for its failure to distinguish current utility from reasons for origin, and Darwin’s own pluralistic approach to identifying the agents of evolutionary change is supported.
5.9K
Exaptation; a missing term in the science of form
TL;DR: This work presents several examples of exaptation, indicating where a failure to concep- tualize such an idea limited the range of hypotheses previously available, and proposes a terminological solution to the problem of preadaptation.
4.7K