Journal Article10.1016/J.AOS.2014.12.003
Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting
743
TL;DR: The authors argue that contradictory societal and institutional pressures, in essence, require organizations to engage in hypocrisy and develop facades, thereby severely limiting the prospects that sustainability reports will ever evolve into substantive disclosures.
read more
Abstract: Sustainability discourse is becoming ubiquitous. Still, a significant gap persists between corporate sustainability talk and practice. Prior research on corporate sustainability reporting has relied primarily on two competing theoretical framings, signaling theory and legitimacy theory, which often produce contradictory results regarding the significance and effects of such disclosures. Thus, despite this substantial body of research, the role that sustainability disclosures can play in any transition toward a less unsustainable society remains unclear. In an effort to advance our collective understanding of voluntary corporate sustainability reporting, we propose a richer and more nuanced theoretical lens by drawing on prior work in organized hypocrisy (Brunsson, 1989) and organizational facades (Abrahamson & Baumard, 2008; Nystrom & Strabuck, 1984). We argue that contradictory societal and institutional pressures, in essence, require organizations to engage in hypocrisy and develop facades, thereby severely limiting the prospects that sustainability reports will ever evolve into substantive disclosures. To illustrate the use of these theoretical concepts, we employ them to examine the talk, decisions, and actions of two highly visible U.S.-based multinational oil and gas corporations during the time period of significant national debate over oil exploration in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge. We conclude that the concepts of organizational facade and organized hypocrisy are beneficial to the sustainability disclosure literature because they provide theoretical space to more formally acknowledge and incorporate how the prevailing economic system and conflicting stakeholder demands constrain the action choices of individual corporations.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure
TL;DR: This paper investigated the effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) activities and their disclosure on firm value, and found that ESG strengths increase firm value and weaknesses decrease it, while disclosure plays a crucial moderating role by mitigating the negative effect of weaknesses and attenuating the positive effect of strengths.
965
Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review
TL;DR: In this paper, the potential economic effects of mandated disclosure and reporting standards for corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability topics are discussed and analyzed for U.S. firms including effects in capital markets, on stakeholders other than investors, and on firm behavior.
ESG practices and the cost of debt: evidence from EU countries
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated whether lending institutions reward firms for their environmental, social and governance performance and disclosure in terms of lowering their cost of debt capital, and they found that firms with stronger ESG performance have a lower cost-of-debt capital.
547
The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting
Ioannis Ioannou,George Serafeim +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of sustainability disclosure regulations on firms' disclosure practices and valuations was examined, and the authors found that the increased likelihood by treated firms of voluntarily receiving assurance to enhance disclosure credibility and increased likelihood of voluntarily adopting reporting guidelines that enhance disclosure comparability.
Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance
Carol A. Adams,Carlos Larrinaga +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a case for research in ethical, social and environmental (or sustainability) accounting and accountability which engages with those organisations claiming to manage and report their sustainability performance.
473
References
Corporate disclosure of environmental capital expenditures: a test of alternative theories
Charles H. Cho,Martin Freedman,Dennis M. Patten +2 more
- 27 May 2009
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine three potential explanations for the corporate choice to disclose environmental capital spending amounts and find that the disclosure appears to be a function of the materiality of the spending and that, for the overwhelming majority of observations, the disclosed amounts are not quantitatively material.
228
Ideas and actions: Justification and hypocrisy as alternatives to control
TL;DR: The difficulty of achieving consistency and control can be partially overcome by combining ideas and actions in two other ways as discussed by the authors, one combination involves justification, and the other hypocrisy, which can be seen as a form of hypocrisy.
226
•Book
The Consequences of Decision-Making
Nils Brunsson
- 01 Jan 2007
TL;DR: The case of budgeting and industrial policy as implementation or legitimacy: Industrial Policy as Implementation or Legitimation 7. Organized Hypocrisy 8. The Irrationality of Action and Action Rationality.
Towards a legitimate compromise? An exploration of Integrated Reporting in the Netherlands
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the multiplicity of views on integrated reporting and to consider the possibility of, and impediments to, reconciling these multiple rationales (orders of worth) and thus gain legitimacy through a compromise.
214
Cargo cult science and the death of politics: A critical review of social and environmental accounting research
TL;DR: In this paper, an extensive literature review delineating the main theoretical parameters that have shaped the discursive field of Social Accounting/Social and Environmental Reporting (SER) focusing particularly on its political character is presented.
188