Journal Article10.1016/J.AOS.2014.12.003
Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting
743
TL;DR: The authors argue that contradictory societal and institutional pressures, in essence, require organizations to engage in hypocrisy and develop facades, thereby severely limiting the prospects that sustainability reports will ever evolve into substantive disclosures.
read more
Abstract: Sustainability discourse is becoming ubiquitous. Still, a significant gap persists between corporate sustainability talk and practice. Prior research on corporate sustainability reporting has relied primarily on two competing theoretical framings, signaling theory and legitimacy theory, which often produce contradictory results regarding the significance and effects of such disclosures. Thus, despite this substantial body of research, the role that sustainability disclosures can play in any transition toward a less unsustainable society remains unclear. In an effort to advance our collective understanding of voluntary corporate sustainability reporting, we propose a richer and more nuanced theoretical lens by drawing on prior work in organized hypocrisy (Brunsson, 1989) and organizational facades (Abrahamson & Baumard, 2008; Nystrom & Strabuck, 1984). We argue that contradictory societal and institutional pressures, in essence, require organizations to engage in hypocrisy and develop facades, thereby severely limiting the prospects that sustainability reports will ever evolve into substantive disclosures. To illustrate the use of these theoretical concepts, we employ them to examine the talk, decisions, and actions of two highly visible U.S.-based multinational oil and gas corporations during the time period of significant national debate over oil exploration in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge. We conclude that the concepts of organizational facade and organized hypocrisy are beneficial to the sustainability disclosure literature because they provide theoretical space to more formally acknowledge and incorporate how the prevailing economic system and conflicting stakeholder demands constrain the action choices of individual corporations.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure
TL;DR: This paper investigated the effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) activities and their disclosure on firm value, and found that ESG strengths increase firm value and weaknesses decrease it, while disclosure plays a crucial moderating role by mitigating the negative effect of weaknesses and attenuating the positive effect of strengths.
965
Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review
TL;DR: In this paper, the potential economic effects of mandated disclosure and reporting standards for corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability topics are discussed and analyzed for U.S. firms including effects in capital markets, on stakeholders other than investors, and on firm behavior.
ESG practices and the cost of debt: evidence from EU countries
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated whether lending institutions reward firms for their environmental, social and governance performance and disclosure in terms of lowering their cost of debt capital, and they found that firms with stronger ESG performance have a lower cost-of-debt capital.
547
The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting
Ioannis Ioannou,George Serafeim +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of sustainability disclosure regulations on firms' disclosure practices and valuations was examined, and the authors found that the increased likelihood by treated firms of voluntarily receiving assurance to enhance disclosure credibility and increased likelihood of voluntarily adopting reporting guidelines that enhance disclosure comparability.
Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance
Carol A. Adams,Carlos Larrinaga +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a case for research in ethical, social and environmental (or sustainability) accounting and accountability which engages with those organisations claiming to manage and report their sustainability performance.
473
References
Social and environmental reporting and hegemonic discourse
TL;DR: This article explored the construction/reproduction of capitalist discourse through social and environmental reporting (SER) and, from this, considered the implications that this may have for the function that SER serves, finding that both SER and corporate social responsibility (CSR) are driven by numerous motivations, although these motivations essentially form part of a business case.
263
Social accounting's emancipatory potential: A Gramscian critique
TL;DR: The work of Gramsci as discussed by the authors suggests that the social accounting project's emancipatory intent can still be realized although this would require a reassessment of the faith that has hitherto been placed in the corporation as an emancipator change agent.
261
•Book
The Oxford Handbook of Business and the Natural Environment
Pratima Bansal,Andrew J. Hoffman +1 more
- 13 Jan 2012
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an overview of the state of the art in the field of finance and accounting in the context of business and non-motor vehicles in the UK.
Corporate disclosure of environmental capital expenditures: A test of alternative theories
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine three potential explanations for the corporate choice to disclose environmental capital spending amounts and find that disclosure appears to be a function of the materiality of the spending.
241
Impression Management in Sustainability Reports: An Empirical Investigation of the Use of Graphs
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate whether firms use graphs in their sustainability reports in order to present a more favorable view of their social and environmental performance, and they find considerable evidence of favorable selectivity bias in the choice of items graphed, and moderate evidence that where distortion in graphing occurs, it also has a favorable bias.