Optimizing patient selection for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer after initial chemotherapy - a single center prospective cohort
Deesje Doppenberg,Frank J. Lagerwaard,Susan van Dieren,Martijn R. Meijerink,J. Van der Vliet,M.G. Besselink,Geertjan van Tienhoven,Eva Versteijne,Bjlcr Slotman,J. Wilmink,Geert Kazemier,Anna M.E. Bruynzeel +11 more
TL;DR: The role of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) as local treatment option after chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is evolving as discussed by the authors .
read more
Abstract: Background The role of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) as local treatment option after chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is evolving. However adequate patient selection criteria for SABR in patients with LAPC are lacking. Methods A prospective institutional database collected data of patients with LAPC treated with chemotherapy, mainly FOLFIRINOX, followed by SABR, which was delivered using magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy, 40 Gy in 5 fractions within two weeks. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for OS. Results Overall, 74 patients were included, median age 66 years, 45.9% had a KPS score of ≥90. Median OS was 19.6 months from diagnosis and 12.1 months from start of SABR. Local control was 90% at one year. Multivariable Cox regression analyses identified KPS ≥90, age <70, and absence of pain prior to SABR as independent favorable predictors for OS. The rate of grade ≥3 fatigue and late gastro-intestinal toxicity was 2.7%. Conclusions SABR is a well-tolerated treatment in patients with unresectable LAPC following chemotherapy, with better outcomes when applied in patients with higher performance score, age <70 years and absence of pain. Future randomized trials will have to confirm these findings.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Comparing different boost concepts and beam configurations for proton therapy of pancreatic cancer
T. Takaoka,Takeshi Yanagi,Shinsei Takahashi,Yuta Shibamoto,Yuto Imai,Dai Okazaki,Masanari Niwa,Akira Torii,N Kita,Seiya Takano,N. Tomita,A. Hiwatashi +11 more
TL;DR: This study compares field-in-field and simultaneous integrated boost concepts for proton therapy of pancreatic cancer, evaluating target coverage and normal organ sparing with different beam configurations and robustness evaluations.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer – A systematic review of prospective data
Mohamed A Shouman,Frederik Fuchs,Franziska Walter,Stefanie Corradini,Benedikt Westphalen,Marlies Vornhülz,Georg Beyer,Dorian Andrade,Claus Belka,Maximilian Niyazi,Paul Rogowski +10 more
TL;DR: Urgent need for broader randomized trials with well-defined patient cohorts to further clarify SBRT's role in PDAC and potential for optimal dosing with fewer side effects.
References
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Elizabeth Eisenhauer,P. Therasse,Jan Bogaerts,Lawrence H. Schwartz,Daniel J. Sargent,Robert Ford,Janet Dancey,S. Arbuck,S. Gwyther,Margaret M. Mooney,Larry Rubinstein,Lalitha K. Shankar,Lori E. Dodd,Robert M. Kaplan,Denis Lacombe,Jaap Verweij +15 more
TL;DR: The revised RECIST includes a new imaging appendix with updated recommendations on the optimal anatomical assessment of lesions, and a section on detection of new lesions, including the interpretation of FDG-PET scan assessment is included.
26.9K
FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Thierry Conroy,Françoise Desseigne,Marc Ychou,Olivier Bouché,Rosine Guimbaud,Yves Becouarn,Antoine Adenis,Jean-Luc Raoul,Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade,Jaafar Bennouna,Jean-Baptiste Bachet,Faiza Khemissa-Akouz,Denis Péré-Vergé,Catherine Delbaldo,Eric Assenat,Bruno Chauffert,C. Montoto-Grillot,Michel Ducreux +17 more
TL;DR: FOLFIRINOX was associated with a survival advantage and had increased toxicity as compared with gemcitabine, and is an option for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and good performance status.
Effect of chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer controlled after 4 months of gemcitabine with or without erlotinib the LAP07 randomized clinical trial
Pascal Hammel,Florence Huguet,Jean-Luc Van Laethem,David Goldstein,Bengt Glimelius,Pascal Artru,Ivan Borbath,Olivier Bouché,Jenny Shannon,Jenny Shannon,Thierry André,Laurent Mineur,Benoist Chibaudel,Franck Bonnetain,Christophe Louvet +14 more
TL;DR: In this open-label, randomized trial involving patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer with disease controlled after 4 months of induction chemotherapy, there was no significant difference in overall survival with chemoradiotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone and there wasno significant difference with gem citabine compared with gemcitabine plus erlotinib used as maintenance therapy.
953
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021
Margaret A. Tempero,Mokenge P. Malafa,Mahmoud M. Al-Hawary,Stephen W. Behrman,Al B. Benson,Dana Backlund Cardin,E. Gabriela Chiorean,Vincent Chung,Brian G. Czito,Marco Del Chiaro,Mary Dillhoff,Timothy R. Donahue,Efrat Dotan,Cristina R. Ferrone,Christos Fountzilas,Jeffrey M. Hardacre,William G. Hawkins,Kelsey Klute,Andrew H. Ko,John W. Kunstman,Noelle K. LoConte,Andrew M. Lowy,Cassadie Moravek,Eric K. Nakakura,Amol Narang,Jorge Obando,Patricio M. Polanco,Sushanth Reddy,Marsha Reyngold,Courtney L. Scaife,Jeanne Shen,Charles M. Vollmer,Robert A. Wolff,Brian M. Wolpin,Beth Lynn,Giby V. George +35 more
Abstract: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death among men and women in the United States. A major challenge in treatment remains patients' advanced disease at diagnosis. The NCCN Guidelines for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma provides recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for patients with pancreatic cancer. Although survival rates remain relatively unchanged, newer modalities of treatment, including targeted therapies, provide hope for improving patient outcomes. Sections of the manuscript have been updated to be concordant with the most recent update to the guidelines. This manuscript focuses on the available systemic therapy approaches, specifically the treatment options for locally advanced and metastatic disease.
878
FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis
Mustafa Suker,Berend R. Beumer,Eran Sadot,Lysiane Marthey,Jason E. Faris,Eric A. Mellon,Bassel F. El-Rayes,Andrea Wang-Gillam,Jill Lacy,Peter J. Hosein,Sing Yu Moorcraft,Thierry Conroy,Florian Hohla,Peter J. Allen,Julien Taieb,Theodore S. Hong,Ravi Shridhar,Ian Chau,Casper H.J. van Eijck,Bas Groot Koerkamp +19 more
TL;DR: Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX had a median overall survival of 24·2 months-longer than that reported with gemcitabine (6-13 months).