Optimized location update protocols for secure and efficient position sharing
Zohaib Riaz,Frank Dürr,Kurt Rothermel +2 more
- 09 Mar 2015
- pp 1-8
9
TL;DR: By evaluating on a set of real-world GPS traces, it is shown that the protocols can reduce the communication overhead by 75% while significantly improving the security guarantees of the original Position Sharing algorithm.
read more
Abstract: Although location-based applications have seen fast growth in the last decade due to pervasive adoption of GPS enabled mobile devices, their use raises privacy concerns. To mitigate these concerns, a number of approaches have been proposed in literature, many of which rely on a trusted party to regulate user privacy. However, trusted parties are known to be prone to data breaches [1]. Consequently, a novel solution, called Position Sharing, was proposed in [2] to secure location privacy in fully non-trusted systems. In Position Sharing, obfuscated position shares of the actual user location are distributed among several location servers, each from a different provider, such that there is no single point of failure if the servers get breached. While Position Sharing can exhibit useful properties such as graceful degradation of privacy, it incurs significant communication overhead as position shares are sent to several location servers instead of one. To this end, we propose a set of location update protocols to minimize the communication overhead of Position Sharing while maintaining the privacy guarantees that it originally provided. As we consider the scenario of frequent location updates, i.e., movement trajectories, our protocols additionally add protection against an attack based on spatio-temporal correlation in published locations. By evaluating on a set of real-world GPS traces, we show that our protocols can reduce the communication overhead by 75% while significantly improving the security guarantees of the original Position Sharing algorithm.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
A view on privacy & trust in IoT
Jörg Daubert,Alexander Wiesmaier,Panayotis Kikiras +2 more
- 08 Jun 2015
TL;DR: This paper proposes a formal model that establishes a relation between information, privacy, as well as trust, and that automatically maps between these terms while maintaining user control.
89
GrapH: Traffic-Aware Graph Processing
TL;DR: GrapH is developed, the first graph processing system using vertex-cut graph partitioning that considers both, diverse vertex traffic and heterogeneous network costs, and the main idea is to avoid frequent communication over expensive network links using an adaptive edge migration strategy.
28
Understanding Vulnerabilities of Location Privacy Mechanisms against Mobility Prediction Attacks
Zohaib Riaz,Frank Dürr,Kurt Rothermel +2 more
- 07 Nov 2017
TL;DR: It is shown that state-of-the-art location obfuscation mechanisms do not provide privacy guarantees against attacks based on mobility prediction, and a mobility prediction attack that exploits location history information of users is designed and demonstrated and shows its effectiveness on a year-long real-world location dataset.
Cell Permanence Time and mobility analysis in infrastructure networks: Analytical/statistical approaches and their applications ☆
TL;DR: This paper presents an in-depth study of mobility information management in infrastructure networks, where the covering devices can have a complete local visibility of what happens in terms of covered nodes.
7
Location Privacy and Utility in Geo-social Networks: Survey and Research Challenges
Zohaib Riaz,Frank Dürr,Kurt Rothermel +2 more
- 01 Aug 2018
TL;DR: Analysis of existing location privacy preserving mechanisms reveals that most existing mechanisms either ignore social platform related user-privacy concerns or they disregard location data-quality related demands of the platform providers.
5
References
Anonymous Usage of Location-Based Services Through Spatial and Temporal Cloaking
Marco Gruteser,Dirk Grunwald +1 more
- 05 May 2003
TL;DR: A middleware architecture and algorithms that can be used by a centralized location broker service that adjusts the resolution of location information along spatial or temporal dimensions to meet specified anonymity constraints based on the entities who may be using location services within a given area.
A formal model of obfuscation and negotiation for location privacy
Matt Duckham,Lars Kulik +1 more
- 08 May 2005
TL;DR: It is argued that obfuscation is an important technique for protecting an individual's location privacy within a pervasive computing environment and a formal framework within which obfuscated location-based services are defined is set out.
Preserving user location privacy in mobile data management infrastructures
Reynold Cheng,Yu Zhang,Elisa Bertino,Sunil Prabhakar +3 more
- 28 Jun 2006
TL;DR: A data model to augment uncertainty to location data is suggested, and imprecise queries that hide the location of the query issuer and yields probabilistic results are proposed that investigate the evaluation and quality aspects for a range query.
A classification of location privacy attacks and approaches
Marius Wernke,Pavel Skvortsov,Frank Dürr,Kurt Rothermel +3 more
- 01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: This paper identifies different protection goals, namely personal information, spatial information (user position), and temporal information (identity/position + time), and gives an overview of basic principles and existing approaches to protect these privacy goals.
334
Position sharing for location privacy in non-trusted systems
Frank Dürr,Pavel Skvortsov,Kurt Rothermel +2 more
- 21 Mar 2011
TL;DR: A position sharing concept which allows for the distribution of position information (shares) of strictly limited accuracy onto several location servers of different providers and shows how position shares of coarse granularity from multiple location servers can be fused into information of higher precision to satisfy the accuracy requirements of different LBS.
55