On the Fundamental Principles of Building a Course in Interdisciplinary Linguistics
Irina V. Shaposhnikova
- 12 Dec 2020
- Vol. 18, Iss: 4, pp 4-15
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider works that systematize methodological aspects of language research using neuro-cognitive technologies, which indicate revolutionary changes in the technical equipment of neurocognitive experiments aimed at studying oral speech, the results of which can no longer be ignored in the construction of language theory.
read more
Abstract: The article deals with general problems of the current state of fundamental linguistic research in connection with the development of the content and practice of teaching linguistic disciplines. The involvement of new knowledge about Man and Language that has been obtained in recent decades is regarded as a necessary condition for building a theory of language and models of its description for teaching theoretical linguistics in the system of linguistic and pedagogical education. As an example, the author gives a brief overview of the materials obtained by scientists from several experimental neurocognitive projects that can shed light on the problem of the relationship between Language and Thinking. The article considers works that systematize methodological aspects of language research using neurocognitive technologies, which indicate revolutionary changes in the technical equipment of neurocognitive experiments aimed at studying oral speech, the results of which can no longer be ignored in the construction of language theory. The author also mentions the most productive discussions of recent times, which use data from neurocognitive experiments as arguments. Assessing the contribution of foreign and domestic discussions on the relationship between Language and Thinking, the author notes the particular contribution of the Russian psycholinguistics, especially to the issues of linguistic and psychological aspects of the circulation of word meanings in the semantic field of culture. The basic principles on which the model of language description can be built within the framework of an interdisciplinary approach are proposed. They are associated with network models, which are the most developed in the current practice of interdisciplinary research in the light of human peculiarities as a species, which allows us to obtain universal data when considering different languages. Theoretical discoveries by Russian psycholinguists concerning Language Personality help to overcome the contradictions between Language and Thinking which arise when these phenomena are viewed as certain abstract and discrete entities represented within the framework of a traditional dichotomy. Sociocommunicative attitudes concerning the ways people manipulate the bodies of language units grow from the intentionality of the language personality, which can be accessed on the model of the associative-verbal network of the studied speech community. Different types of network models solve different problems in the Human and Language Sciences and can be used in a complementary way. Thus, the general idea of Interdisciplinary Linguistics and the corresponding theoretical courses should take into account the main dimensions of human formation.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Integrating Role of the Conception of Language Personality in the Development of the Theory of Language
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the psycholinguistic explication of the Russian language personality (RLP) on the experimentally obtained associative-verbal-network (AVN) model at the end of the XXth century and the methodological contribution of the RLP conception, proposed by Yu.N. Karaulov, to the development of a general theory of language.
Systematicity and integrity of language in the context of integrated knowledge about human
TL;DR: In this paper , a working definition of the language system in the context of its integrity, considering epistemological issues related to the emergence of conceptually different approaches to the explication of language systematicity, focuses on the role of material substrate of the languages, and considers fundamental domestic contribution to the development of the general theory and systemology of language proceeding from the ontological grounds for its integrity.
1
References
•Book
Language and social networks
Lesley Milroy
- 01 Jan 1980
TL;DR: This book discusses language, Class and Community, and Studying Language in the Community: The Fieldworker and the Social Network, which aims to clarify the role of language in the community and its role in the lived experience.
2.4K
•Book
Language And Human Behaviour
Derek Bickerton
- 29 Jan 1996
TL;DR: The author stresses the necessity of viewing intelligence in evolutionary terms, seeing it not as problem solving but as a way of maintaining homeostasis - the preservation of those conditions most favorable to an organism, the optimal achievable conditions for survival and well-being.
482
Highlights of Practical Applications of Cyber-Physical Multi-Agent Systems
Javier Bajo,Zita Vale,Kasper Hallenborg,Ana Paula Rocha,Philippe Mathieu,Pawel Pawlewski,Elena del Val,Paulo Novais,Fernando Lopes,Néstor Darío Duque-Méndez,Vicente Julián,Johan Holmgren +11 more
- 01 Jun 2017
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors use agent-based modelling techniques to describe the behaviour of different stakeholders in a smooth manner and to analyse complex interactions and the impact of local decisions at network level.
83
Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System: The Mirror System Hypothesis on the linkage of action and languages
Michael A. Arbib
- 01 Sep 2006
TL;DR: The human brain also contains a “mirror system for grasping” in the sense of a region active for both execution and observation of manual actions as compared to some baseline task like simply observing an object.
40
How to study spoken language understanding: a survey of neuroscientific methods
TL;DR: The past 20 years have seen a methodological revolution in spoken language research and a diverse range of neuroscientific techniques are now available that allow researchers to observe the brain's responses to different types of speech stimuli in both healthy and impaired listeners, and also to observe how individuals' abilities to process speech change as a consequence of disrupting processing in specific brain regions.
7