On strong anticipation

TL;DR: The conceptual basis and architecture of ADAM is described, which combines reactive error correction processes (adaptation) with predictive temporal extrapolation processes (anticipation) inspired by the computational neuroscience concept of internal models and creates a novel and promising approach for exploring adaptation and anticipation in SMS.

TL;DR: Large amounts of “good variance”—variance in the space of elements that has no effect on the overall performance—have been documented across a variety of natural actions, which support the view that there is no problem of motor redundancy; there is bliss of motor abundance.

TL;DR: It is argued that the free energy principle and the ecological and enactive approach to mind and life make for a much happier marriage of ideas, and that thefree energy principle is best understood in ecological andEnactive terms.

TL;DR: A fundamental definition of an Individual based on the ability to pursue goals at an appropriate level of scale and organization is proposed and a formalism for defining and comparing the cognitive capacities of highly diverse types of agents is suggested.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that the fundamental assumption of compensation for visual delays states that, since delays are dealt with, there must be compensatory mechanisms, and this assumption may not be fundamental, and nor should the existence of internal models be assumed.

TL;DR: Pfeffer as discussed by the authors defined periodic movements of Leguminosae as the action of more or less joint or hingelike portions of the leaf and defined the essential character of periodic movements as defined by Pfefifer.

TL;DR: One clarification that has emerged is that visual prediction is a process that either complements or reflects non-visual (e.g., motor) prediction as mentioned in this paper, and that motor processes compensate for all neural delays.