Obstruction in Crohn's Disease: Strictureplasty Versus Resection.

TL;DR: Strictureplasty does not replace resection, but must be considered as a valid adjunct to conventional excisions surgery for obstructive small bowel Crohn’s disease, expecially when the patient is vulnerable to short bowel syndrome.

Abstract: Although the long-term outcome of patients undergoing strictureplasty is still to be determined, safety and effectiveness of this technique have been widely demonstrated in several reports during the past decade, with follow-up up to 10 years. However, since contraindications exist, careful selection of patients is needed. Thus, strictureplasty does not replace resection, but must be considered as a valid adjunct to conventional excisions surgery for obstructive small bowel Crohn's disease, expecially when the patient is vulnerable to short bowel syndrome. Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to determine whether or not nonresective techniques should be used with the view of sparing bowel length, in cases where resection can be done without an actual risk of short bowel syndrome (eg, terminal ileitis, where resection of terminal ileum and cecum has always been considered the "gold standard").