Journal Article10.1109/TEVC.2016.2519758
Objective Extraction for Many-Objective Optimization Problems: Algorithm and Test Problems
71
TL;DR: An objective extraction method (OEM) for MaOPs that formulates the reduced objective as a linear combination of the original objectives to maximize the conflict between the reduced objectives and can thus preserve the dominance structure as much as possible.
read more
Abstract: For many-objective optimization problems (MaOPs), in which the number of objectives is greater than three, the performance of most existing evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms generally deteriorates over the number of objectives. As some MaOPs may have redundant or correlated objectives, it is desirable to reduce the number of the objectives in such circumstances. However, the Pareto solution of the reduced MaOP obtained by most of the existing objective reduction methods, based on objective selection, may not be the Pareto solution of the original MaOP. In this paper, we propose an objective extraction method (OEM) for MaOPs. It formulates the reduced objective as a linear combination of the original objectives to maximize the conflict between the reduced objectives. Subsequently, the Pareto solution of the reduced MaOP obtained by the proposed algorithm is that of the original MaOP, and the proposed algorithm can thus preserve the dominance structure as much as possible. Moreover, we propose a novel framework that features both simple and complicated Pareto set shapes for many-objective test problems with an arbitrary number of essential objectives. Within this framework, we can control the importance of essential objectives. As there is no direct performance metric for the objective reduction algorithms on the benchmarks, we present a new metric that features simplicity and usability for the objective reduction algorithms. We compare the proposed OEM with three objective reduction methods, i.e., REDGA, L-PCA, and NL-MVU-PCA, on the proposed test problems and benchmark DTLZ5 with different numbers of objectives and essential objectives. Our numerical studies show the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed approach.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
A benchmark test suite for evolutionary many-objective optimization
TL;DR: This paper carefully select (or modify) 15 test problems with diverse properties to construct a benchmark test suite, aiming to promote the research of evolutionary many-objective optimization (EMaO) via suggesting a set of testblems with a good representation of various real-world scenarios.
A Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Reference Direction for Multiobjective and Many-Objective Optimization
Shouyong Jiang,Shengxiang Yang +1 more
TL;DR: An early developed and computationally expensive strength Pareto-based evolutionary algorithm is revived by introducing an efficient reference direction-based density estimator, a new fitness assignment scheme, and a new environmental selection strategy, for handling both multiobjective and many-objective problems.
A survey on evolutionary computation for complex continuous optimization
TL;DR: A comprehensive survey of evolutionary computation algorithms for dealing with 5-M complex challenges is presented by proposing a novel taxonomy according to the function of the approaches, including reducing problem difficulty, increasing algorithm diversity, accelerating convergence speed, reducing running time, and extending application field.
Resource Allocation in 5G IoV Architecture Based on SDN and Fog-Cloud Computing
TL;DR: A novel 5G IoV architecture is designed on the basis of fog-cloud computing and software-defined networking (SDN), and a many-objective optimization algorithm is proposed that outperforms the other state-of-the-art algorithms.
237
Edge-Cloud Resource Scheduling in Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks for Internet of Vehicles
TL;DR: A SAGIN-IoV edge–cloud architecture based on software-defined networking (SDN) and network function virtualization (NFV) and an improved algorithm are proposed that can effectively optimize the resource scheduling problem of SAGin-IioV.
151
References
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
TL;DR: This paper suggests a non-dominated sorting-based MOEA, called NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II), which alleviates all of the above three difficulties, and modify the definition of dominance in order to solve constrained multi-objective problems efficiently.
•Book
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Kalyanmoy Deb,Deb Kalyanmoy +1 more
- 01 Jan 2001
TL;DR: This text provides an excellent introduction to the use of evolutionary algorithms in multi-objective optimization, allowing use as a graduate course text or for self-study.
MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition
Qingfu Zhang,Hui Li +1 more
TL;DR: Experimental results have demonstrated that MOEA/D with simple decomposition methods outperforms or performs similarly to MOGLS and NSGA-II on multiobjective 0-1 knapsack problems and continuous multiobjectives optimization problems.
•Book
Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization
Kaisa Miettinen
- 26 Sep 2011
TL;DR: This paper is concerned with the development of methods for dealing with the role of symbols in the interpretation of semantics.
5.6K
Indicator-Based Selection in Multiobjective Search
Eckart Zitzler,Simon Künzli +1 more
- 18 Sep 2004
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a general indicator-based evolutionary algorithm (IBEA) that can be combined with arbitrary indicators and can be adapted to the preferences of the user and moreover does not require any additional diversity preservation mechanism such as fitness sharing to be used.