Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women's Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks:

TL;DR: Thorndike as discussed by the authors argues that the relative immaturity of the sciences dealing with man is continually stressed, but it is claimed that they provide a body of facts and principles which are "far above zero knowledge" and that even now they are capable of affording valuable guidance in the shaping of public policy.

TL;DR: This chapter reviews current theory and research on moral emotions and focuses on a triad of negatively valenced "self-conscious" emotions-shame, guilt, and embarrassment.

TL;DR: An expanded sense of dehumanization emerges, in which the phenomenon is not unitary, is not restricted to the intergroup context, and does not occur only under conditions of conflict or extreme negative evaluation.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a method to use the information of the user's interaction with the system to improve the performance of the system. But they do not consider the impact of the interaction on the overall system.

TL;DR: Approaches to understanding girls and women the meanings of difference - sex, gender and cognitive abilities images of women "Doing Gender" -sex, status and power biological influences on sex and gender becoming gendered - childhood adolescence - becoming a woman sex, love and romance commitments - women and long term relationships motherhood - image, institution and experience women, work and achievement midlife and beyond violence against women psychological adjustment - dysfunction and therapy as discussed by the authors.

TL;DR: Shame is normal, not pathological, though opposite reactions to shame underlie many conflicts among individuals and groups, and some styles of handling shame are clearly maladaptive.

TL;DR: Dimensions of stigma that may account for differences in the tendency to attribute negative outcomes to prejudice, and implications for weight loss programs and psychotherapy for the overweight, are discussed.