Open Access
Object rivalry: Competition between incompatible representations of the same object
Nicholas C. Hindy
- 01 Jan 2012
TL;DR: Thompson-Schill et al. as mentioned in this paper found that the degree to which an object is described as changing in state predicts the strength of the prefrontal cortex conflict response, and the dissimilarity of object states predicts the pattern dissimilarities of visual cortex brain states.
read more
Abstract: To understand that an object has changed state during an event, we must represent the `before' and `after' states of that object. Because a physical object cannot be in multiple states at any one moment in time, these `before' and `after' object states are mutually exclusive. In the same way that alternative states of a physical object are mutually exclusive, are cognitive representations of alternative object states also incompatible? If so, comprehension of an object state-change involves interference between the constituent object states. Through a series of functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments, we test the hypothesis that comprehension of object state-change requires the cognitive system to resolve conflict between representationally distinct brain states. We discover that (1) comprehension of an object state-change evokes a neural response in prefrontal cortex that is the same as that found for known forms of conflict, (2) the degree to which an object is described as changing in state predicts the strength of the prefrontal cortex conflict response, (3) the dissimilarity of object states predicts the pattern dissimilarity of visual cortex brain states, and (4) visual cortex pattern dissimilarity predicts the strength of the prefrontal cortex conflict response. Results from these experiments suggest that distinct and incompatible representations of an object compete when representing object state-change. The greater the dissimilarity between described object states, the greater the dissimilarity between rival brain states, and the greater the conflict. Degree Type Dissertation Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Graduate Group Psychology First Advisor Sharon L. Thompson-Schill
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
References
An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function
Earl K. Miller,Jonathan D. Cohen +1 more
TL;DR: It is proposed that cognitive control stems from the active maintenance of patterns of activity in the prefrontal cortex that represent goals and the means to achieve them, which provide bias signals to other brain structures whose net effect is to guide the flow of activity along neural pathways that establish the proper mappings between inputs, internal states, and outputs needed to perform a given task.
AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
TL;DR: A package of computer programs for analysis and visualization of three-dimensional human brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) results is described and techniques for automatically generating transformed functional data sets from manually labeled anatomical data sets are described.
11.3K
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
HighWire Press
- 01 Jan 1886
TL;DR: The Philosophical Transactions of theRoyal Society is a scientific journal published by the Royal Society, making it the first journal in the world exclusively devoted to science, and therefore the world's longest-running scientific journal.
10.6K
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Robert Desimone,John S. Duncan +1 more
TL;DR: The two basic phenomena that define the problem of visual attention can be illustrated in a simple example and selectivity-the ability to filter out un wanted information is illustrated.
8.4K