Open Access10.26593/JIHI.V11I2.2538.%P
North Korea and Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) Lesson Learned and Opportunities From North Korea Involvement in NAM
Albert Triwibowo
- 01 Jan 2015
- Vol. 11, Iss: 2, pp 96534
2
TL;DR: In this article, a new player should be added into the negotiation process to solve North Korea's nuclear crisis, which should be free of interest, reliable, and have a strong connection with North Korea.
read more
Abstract: Many experts still believe that engagement would be the answer towards the recent situation in Korean peninsula. Up to now, few contacts which have taken place can hardly be called as negotiations. Looking at the situation, a new player could be added into the negotiation process to solve North Korea’s nuclear crisis. The new player should be free of interest, reliable, and has a strong connection with North Korea. It is already over 40 years since North Korea was accepted as full-fledged member and North Korea has gained immeasurably by joining Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). Thus NAM is probably one of the most promising exit strategies for North Korea nuclear crisis, the engagement that could provide coalition for punishment tomorrow. The movement could be an opportunity for North Korean nuclear problem, since it has long history with North Korea, freer from superpower interest, and provide a lot of benefits to North Korean regime.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
References
The English School: an underexploited resource in IR
TL;DR: The English School is an underutilized research resource and deserves a larger role in IR than it currently has as discussed by the authors, and more work needs to be done to develop the English School's theoretical position, particularly in understanding the relationship between international and world society.
•Book
Nuclear North Korea: A Debate on Engagement Strategies
Victor D. Cha,David C. Kang +1 more
- 26 Apr 2005
TL;DR: In this paper, Cha and Kang discuss the debate over North Korea and why we must pursue "hawk engagement" (Cha) and why are we so afraid of engagement? (Kang).
168
Bad, Mad, Sad or Rational Actor? Why the ‘Securitization’ Paradigm makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea
TL;DR: The authors argued that the dominant Securitization paradigm no longer provides a useful frame of reference for international policy-makers having to ‘do business’ with North Korea and argued for the utility of a historicized and contextualized rational actor model which, it is argued, offers a realistic underpinning for international policies that seriously wish to promote peace, stability and freedom from hunger on the Korean peninsula.
94
International Relations Theory and the Second Korean War
TL;DR: The authors examined the assumptions underlying these theories and revealed how the assumptions can become mis-specified, and showed that scholars have made mistakes in both areas: either they misunderstood the initial conditions, or they misunderstood their theory.
Inside multilateralism: The six‐party talks
TL;DR: Despite extensive diplomatic efforts to facilitate the six-party talks, domestic policy constraints, differing priorities, and conflicting historical analogies among each of the countries have brought vastly differing perspectives to the multilateral negotiating table.
81