Journal Article10.1016/J.EJOR.2009.02.023
Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral
218
TL;DR: This paper proposes a non-additive robust ordinal regression on a set of alternatives A, whose utility is evaluated in terms of the Choquet integral which permits to represent the interaction among criteria, modelled by the fuzzy measures, parameterizing the approach.
read more
About: This article is published in European Journal of Operational Research. The article was published on 16 Feb 2010. The article focuses on the topics: Ordinal regression & Preference relation.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Preference Learning Using the Choquet Integral: The Case of Multipartite Ranking
TL;DR: This work proposes a novel method for preference learning or, more specifically, learning to rank, where the task is to learn a ranking model that takes a subset of alternatives as input and produces a ranking of these alternatives as output.
Choquet integrals with respect to the credibility measure
TL;DR: This paper proposes the Choquet integral of measurable functions on the credibility space, bridging Choquet integral and credibility theory, and investigates its properties, including monotonicity and translatability, for nonnegative and symmetric functions.
A Novel SIR·Choquet Method for Multiple Attributes Group Decision-Making with Interval Grey Linguistic
Fang Wang,Dan-Yang Du,Jin Zhao +2 more
TL;DR: The classical method named superiority and inferiority ranking (i.e. SIR) method is extended to solve the MAGDM problems in an IGL environment and the Gaussian criterion is employed to describe the DM’s preference structure.
Dealing with Uncertainties in MCDA
Theodor J. Stewart,Ian N. Durbach,Ian N. Durbach +2 more
- 01 Jan 2016
TL;DR: Four broad approaches to dealing with external uncertainties are discussed, primarily in the context of pairwise comparisons of alternatives; stochastic dominance concepts; the use of surrogate risk measures as additional decision criteria; and the integration of MCDA and scenario planning.
References
The Analytic Hierarchy Process
Thomas L. Saaty,Kevin P. Kearns +1 more
- 01 Jan 1985
TL;DR: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as mentioned in this paper is a systematic procedure for representing the elements of any problem hierarchically, which organizes the basic rationality by breaking down a problem into its smaller constituent parts and then guides decision makers through a series of pairwise comparison judgments to express the relative strength or intensity of impact of the elements in the hierarchy.
16.9K
•Book
A mathematical theory of evidence
Glenn Shafer
- 01 Jan 1976
TL;DR: This book develops an alternative to the additive set functions and the rule of conditioning of the Bayesian theory: set functions that need only be what Choquet called "monotone of order of infinity." and Dempster's rule for combining such set functions.
14.6K
•Book
Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs
Ralph L. Keeney,Howard Raiffa,David W. Rajala +2 more
- 01 Jan 1976
TL;DR: In this article, a confused decision maker, who wishes to make a reasonable and responsible choice among alternatives, can systematically probe his true feelings in order to make those critically important, vexing trade-offs between incommensurable objectives.
A Value for n-person Games
Lloyd S. Shapley
- 18 Mar 1952
TL;DR: In this paper, an examination of elementary properties of a value for the essential case is presented, which is deduced from a set of three axioms, having simple intuitive interpretations.
Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.
Abstract: Many of the complex problems faced by decision makers involve multiple conflicting objectives. This book describes how a confused decision maker, who wishes to make a reasonable and responsible choice among alternatives, can systematically probe his true feelings in order to make those critically important, vexing trade-offs between incommensurable objectives. The theory is illustrated by many real concrete examples taken from a host of disciplinary settings. The standard approach in decision theory or decision analysis specifies a simplified single objective like monetary return to maximise. By generalising from the single objective case to the multiple objective case, this book considerably widens the range of applicability of decision analysis.
5.8K