Nomogram for predicting rebleeding after initial endoscopic epinephrine injection monotherapy hemostasis in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a retrospective cohort study
TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper developed a predictive nomogram of rebleeding after endoscopic epinephrine injection (EI) monotherapy, which can be conveniently used to identify low-risk patients after EI monotherapy.
read more
Abstract: Abstract Background Although the current guidelines recommend endoscopic combination therapy, endoscopic epinephrine injection (EI) monotherapy is still a simple, common and effective modality for treating peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). However, the rebleeding risk after EI monotherapy is still high, and identifying rebleeding patients after EI monotherapy is unclear, which is highly important in clinical practice. This study aimed to identify risk factors and constructed a predictive nomogram related to rebleeding after EI monotherapy. Methods We consecutively and retrospectively analyzed 360 PUB patients who underwent EI monotherapy between March 2014 and July 2021 in our center. Then we identified independent risk factors associated with rebleeding after initial endoscopic EI monotherapy by multivariate logistic regression. A predictive nomogram was developed and validated based on the above predictors. Results Among all PUB patients enrolled, 51 (14.2%) had recurrent hemorrhage within 30 days after endoscopic EI monotherapy. After multivariate logistic regression, shock [odds ratio (OR) = 12.691, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.129–31.399, p < 0.001], Rockall score (OR = 1.877, 95% CI 1.250–2.820, p = 0.002), tachycardia (heart rate > 100 beats/min) (OR = 2.610, 95% CI 1.098–6.203, p = 0.030), prolonged prothrombin time (PT > 13 s) (OR = 2.387, 95% CI 1.019–5.588, p = 0.045) and gastric ulcer (OR = 2.258, 95% CI 1.003–5.084, p = 0.049) were associated with an increased risk of rebleeding after an initial EI monotherapy treatment. A nomogram incorporating these independent high-risk factors showed good discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.876 (95% CI 0.817–0.934) (p < 0.001). Conclusions We developed a predictive nomogram of rebleeding after EI monotherapy, which had excellent prediction accuracy. This predictive nomogram can be conveniently used to identify low-risk rebleeding patients after EI monotherapy, allowing for decision-making in a clinical setting.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
References
Peptic ulcer disease
TL;DR: This work focuses on this revolution of understanding and management of peptic ulcer disease over the past 25 years, largely because of the increasingly widespread use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and low-dose aspirin.
1.4K
Peptic ulcer disease.
TL;DR: In the final paragraph of that classical volume, "Peptic Ulcer" (1) published in 1951, three of the most eminent gastrointestinal physicians, namely A. C. Ivy, Morton Grossman and William Bachrach, predicted that "future research will reveal orally-active innocuous substances for specifically preventing the formation of acid by the parietal cells and/or rendering the gastric and duodenal mucosa less susceptible to injury".
1.1K
Endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding
TL;DR: Patients with haematemesis were admitted to hospital earlier and had endoscopy more quickly than patients with melaena alone; this probably accounted for the higher endoscopic success-rate in this group.
952
Peptic ulcer disease
Ángel Lanas,Francis K.L. Chan +1 more
TL;DR: Peptic ulcer disease is less prevalent but management has become more challenging due to increasing antimicrobial resistance, complex anti-thrombotic therapy, and diagnostic and therapeutic challenges associated with non-H pylori and non-NSAID related ulcers.
695
Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Guideline Recommendations From the International Consensus Group.
Alan N. Barkun,Majid A Almadi,Ernst J. Kuipers,Loren Laine,Joseph J.Y. Sung,Frances Tse,Grigorios I. Leontiadis,Neena S. Abraham,Xavier Calvet,Francis K.L. Chan,James D. Douketis,Robert Enns,Ian M. Gralnek,Vipul Jairath,Dennis M. Jensen,James Y.W. Lau,Gregory Y.H. Lip,Romaric Loffroy,Fauze Maluf-Filho,Andrew C. Meltzer,Nageshwar D. Reddy,John R. Saltzman,John Marshall,Marc Bardou +23 more
TL;DR: This update focuses on resuscitation and risk assessment; preendoscopic, endoscopic, and pharmacologic management; and secondary prophylaxis for recurrent UGIB, as well as assessing the methodological quality of existing systematic reviews.