Next generation genetics
TL;DR: It is argued, why this traditional approach to genetic research should be supplemented or even replaced by modeling approaches in accordance with the complexity of biological systems, if any reasonable hope is to understand the genetics behind any trait and bring genetics into practical use in medicine for common diseases.
read more
Abstract: One of the goals in genetic research aims at identifying genes in biochemical and physiological processes to reveal genetic causes of rare and common diseases. Previous obstacles such as costly genotyping or sequencing have been reduced with the chip-based genomewide association studies (GWAS), now culminating with the latest toy—next generation sequencing methodologies (NGS). Concomitantly, computer technologies have evolved to an increasing use of multicore processors and distributed computing on large networks or grids. Although the technologies are not perfect, we now have unprecedented opportunities to perform genetic studies not possible just 10 years ago. The hype about these new technologies have been large, but all the promises have however not been fulfilled entirely as hoped for. Maybe because the hype has been more about the technologies as such, and less about their intended use. Millions of genetic variations have been detected by GWAS and NGS, but only a few have been linked to diseases—with almost no practical clinical significance. A major reason for this apparent deadlock is the inadequacy of the models used, which are based on the traditional “Mendelian” approach, in which one gene is supposed to have a main effect on a trait or a disease. However, most genes claimed to be associated with a disease have small effects and only a tiny fraction of the genetic variance has been captured.
In this short notice it is argued, why this traditional approach should be supplemented or even replaced by modeling approaches in accordance with the complexity of biological systems, if we shall have any reasonable hope to understand the genetics behind any trait and bring genetics into practical use in medicine for common diseases (Costanzo et al., 2010; Ramanan et al., 2012).
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
The genetics of bone mass and susceptibility to bone diseases
TL;DR: High-throughput DNA sequencing, large genomic databases and improved methods of data analysis have greatly accelerated the gene-discovery process, and notable advances in gene discovery suggest that the next decade will witness cataloguing of the hundreds of genes that influence bone mass and osteoporosis, which in turn will provide a roadmap for the development of new drugs that target diseases of low bone mass.
80
Network-based analysis of the sphingolipid metabolism in hypertension.
TL;DR: A two-step procedure is presented in which physiological heterogeneity is disentangled and genetic effects are analyzed by variance decomposition of genetic interactions and by an information theoretical approach including 162 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 84 genes in the sphingolipid metabolism and related networks in blood pressure regulation.
Gastric bypass surgery reveals independency of obesity and diabetes melitus type 2
Mogens Fenger,D.L. Hansen,Dorte Worm,Lisbeth E. Hvolris,Viggo B. Kristiansen,Elin Rebecka Carlsson,Sten Madsbad +6 more
TL;DR: Although RYGB “normalized” many glycaemic parameters in some of the diabetic subjects apparently converting to a non-diabetics state, other diabetic subjects stay diabetic in the context of the new gut anatomy after surgery, suggesting that the obesity part of the glycaemia derangement may have been ameliorated, but some defects of theabetic state had not.
Skeletal genomics: a report from the annual meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR 2014)
Wen-Chi Chou,David Karasik +1 more
TL;DR: The 2014 Annual Meeting took place in Houston, Texas and a fair representation of the genetic, genomic and other ‘-omic’ research was reflected.
easyGWAS: A Cloud-based Platform for Comparing the Results of Genome-wide Association Studies
Dominik G. Grimm,Damian Roqueiro,Damian Roqueiro,Patrice A. Salomé,Stefan Kleeberger,Bastian Greshake,Wangsheng Zhu,Chang Liu,Christoph Lippert,Oliver Stegle,Bernhard Schölkopf,Detlef Weigel,Karsten M. Borgwardt +12 more
TL;DR: The easyGWAS tool supports multiple species, the uploading of private genotype data and summary statistics of existing GWAS, as well as advanced methods for comparing GWAS results across different experiments and data sets in an interactive and user-friendly interface.
References
The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
TL;DR: Developments in this field are reviewed, including such concepts as the small-world effect, degree distributions, clustering, network correlations, random graph models, models of network growth and preferential attachment, and dynamical processes taking place on networks.
Finding and evaluating community structure in networks.
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that the algorithms proposed are highly effective at discovering community structure in both computer-generated and real-world network data, and can be used to shed light on the sometimes dauntingly complex structure of networked systems.
The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection
TL;DR: Although it is true that most text-books of genetics open with a chapter on biometry, closer inspection will reveal that this has little connexion with the body of the work, and that more often than not it is merely belated homage to a once fashionable study.
13.7K
A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics
TL;DR: A basic taxonomy of feature selection techniques is provided, providing their use, variety and potential in a number of both common as well as upcoming bioinformatics applications.
5.4K