1. What are the contributions in "Multiple component learning for object detection" ?
In this paper the authors propose a discriminative learning approach for detection that is inspired by part-based recognition approaches.. The basis of mcl lies in learning a set classifier ; the authors achieve this by combining boosting with weakly supervised learning, specifically the Multiple Instance Learning framework ( mil ).. Mcl is general, and the authors demonstrate results on a range of data from computer audition and computer vision.
read more
2. What have the authors stated for future works in "Multiple component learning for object detection" ?
In future work the authors plan on speeding up mcl, and seeing if tradeoffs in accuracy are necessary to achieve near real-time speeds.. Additionally, results could be further improved by adapting mil-boost to better suit the needs of mcl.
read more

![Fig. 7. Results on pedestrian detection. Left: mcl outperforms all reported results. At a false positive per window rate (FPPW) of 10−4, a commonly used reference point, mcl has a miss rate of ∼4%, compared to ∼7% for [3] and ∼10% for [2]. For comparison we also implemented the SoftCascade approach described in [28], using the same candidate Haar features we use in mcl. Consistent with previously reported results, a cascade of Haars performs poorly. Right: Results on artificially generated occlusion. We overlaid random 30x30 or 45x45 patches into random locations in the pedestrian test images. We then regenerated the ROC curves for mcl as well as SoftCascade (which, like [2, 3], is not part-based). mcl on data with 30x30 performs similarly to SoftCascade on unoccluded data, and as the amount of occlusion increases, the gap between mcl and SoftCascade further increases.](/figures/fig-7-results-on-pedestrian-detection-left-mcl-outperforms-je6w4efk.png)



