Open Access
Multilingual learning with parameter co-occurrence clustering
Max Bane,James Kirby,Jason Riggle,John Sylak +3 more
- 02 Dec 2011
pp 67-82
TL;DR: The authors define multilingualism as the knowledge and use of many distinct, though possibly overlapping linguistic systems by individual speakers, and define it as a pervasive phenomenon with virtually all language users being able to distinguish and employ multiple linguistic systems at various points on the language-dialect-register continuum.
read more
Abstract: Multilingualism may be viewed in the broadest sense as the knowledge and use of many distinct, though possibly overlapping linguistic systems by individual speakers. It is, according to this view, a pervasive phenomenon, with virtually all language users—even those commonly called monolingual—being able to distinguish and employ multiple linguistic systems at various points on the language-dialect-register continuum. In addition to the canonical examples of native bilingualism, code-switching, etc., this definition will include such things as the “multi-dialectism” described in Clopper’s (2004) extensive study of American English speakers’ abilities to distinguish and categorize multiple dialects, as well as to produce multiple dialects natively and even imitate them non-natively. Also included is the case of register variation, wherein speakers make use of systematically different phonological, morphological, and syntactic forms and processes (in effect, distinct systems of communication) depending on social and conversational context; Biber (1995) gives a detailed cross-linguistic survey. In this view, then, a speaker who “knows a language” like English, Cantonese, Palauan, or Guarani, in fact knows a collection of mostly overlapping, yet distinct, systems of communication, including registers, dialects, and others’ idiolects, some perhaps acquired to different degrees, or only passively (i.e., to be recognized and distinguished, but not produced), along with some specification of their contexts of use. A fundamental question, then, is how language learners in a pervasively multilingual environment, where they receive mixed samples from many distinct linguistic systems, can manage to distinguish the component systems and acquire them separately. For example, if a learner is exposed to languages L1 and L2, where L1 epenthesizes onsets and L2
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
OT grammars, beyond partial orders: ERC sets and antimatroids
Nazarré Merchant,Jason Riggle +1 more
TL;DR: Antimat and RCErc as mentioned in this paper are inverses of each other and both maintain the structural properties of ERC sets and antimatroids, but they are different functions from consistent sets.
41
References
The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
TL;DR: Developments in this field are reviewed, including such concepts as the small-world effect, degree distributions, clustering, network correlations, random graph models, models of network growth and preferential attachment, and dynamical processes taking place on networks.
Community structure in social and biological networks
Michelle Girvan,Mark Newman +1 more
TL;DR: This article proposes a method for detecting communities, built around the idea of using centrality indices to find community boundaries, and tests it on computer-generated and real-world graphs whose community structure is already known and finds that the method detects this known structure with high sensitivity and reliability.
A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness
Linton C. Freeman
- 01 Mar 1977
TL;DR: A family of new measures of point and graph centrality based on early intuitions of Bavelas (1948) is introduced in this paper, which define centrality in terms of the degree to which a point falls on the shortest path between others and there fore has a potential for control of communication.
10.1K
•Book
Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar
Alan Prince,Paul Smolensky +1 more
- 24 Sep 2004
TL;DR: In this article, Berber and Elmedlaoui present a theory for the construction of grammars in Optimality Theory, which is based on a core Syllabification in Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber.
5.3K
A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality
TL;DR: New algorithms for betweenness are introduced in this paper and require O(n + m) space and run in O(nm) and O( nm + n2 log n) time on unweighted and weighted networks, respectively, where m is the number of links.
Related Papers (5)
Peter Trudgill
- 01 Jan 2003