Journal Article10.1016/J.SURVOPHTHAL.2017.03.005
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses: An Overview
Jorge L. Alió,Ana B. Plaza-Puche,Roberto Fernández-Buenaga,Joseph Pikkel,Miguel J. Maldonado +4 more
309
TL;DR: To avoid patient dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation, it is important to consider preoperatively the patient's lifestyle; perform an exhaustive examination including biometry, topography, and pupil reactivity; and explain the visual expectations and possible postoperative complications.
read more
About: This article is published in Survey of Ophthalmology. The article was published on 01 Sep 2017. The article focuses on the topics: Multifocal intraocular lens & Multifocal lenses.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Presbyopia: Effectiveness of correction strategies
TL;DR: A redefinition of presbyopia is proposed that states “presbyopia occurs when the physiologically normal age‐related reduction in the eye's focusing range reaches a point, when optimally corrected for distance vision, that the clarity of vision at near is insufficient to satisfy an individual's requirements”.
279
Multifocal and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in 2020.
Radhika Rampat,Damien Gatinel +1 more
TL;DR: The range of vision targeted, pupil dependence, toric availability as well as type of optical platform is provided as a practical guide to demystify existing terminology on the market that may create interest around a 'new' design that is actually not novel at all.
189
Extended Depth-of-Field Intraocular Lenses: An Update.
TL;DR: This article clarifies what an EDOF IOL is and proposes naming lenses that have combined optical designs as “hybrid IOLs,” which are commonly a subject of confusion with optical multifocality concepts.
147
AcrySof IQ PanOptix Intraocular Lens Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Clinical Overview.
TL;DR: Overall, the clinical evidence suggests that in general good visual outcomes, along with a high degree of spectacle independence, are achieved in patients implanted with the PanOptix, FineVision, AT LISA and Symfony IOLs.
117
References
Refractive results with secondary piggyback implantation to correct pseudophakic refractive errors.
Zohar Habot-Wilner,Dan Sachs,Michael Cahane,Amir Alhalel,Howard Desatnik,Emanuel Schwalb,Irina S. Barequet +6 more
TL;DR: An IOL type that is appropriate for implantation in the ciliary sulcus is a viable option for correcting pseudophakic refractive error using the piggyback technique.
Reasons for secondary surgical intervention after phacoemulsification with posterior chamber lens implantation.
Soman Raman,Richard Redmond +1 more
TL;DR: The indications for secondary intervention included unsatisfactory refractive outcome, posterior settlement of the IOL, unwanted imagery, inappropriate IOL power, and IOL dislocation.
Differences in contrast sensitivity between monofocal, multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses: long‐term results
TL;DR: This study aims to evaluate long‐term contrast sensitivity (CS) and visual acuity following implantation of monofocal, accommodating, refractive and diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with unilateral cataract.
Subjective photic phenomena with refractive multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses. results of a multicenter questionnaire.
TL;DR: Subjective photic phenomena were experienced significantly more often by patients who had refractive MIOLs than by those who had monofocal IOLs.