Open AccessPosted Content
Most Complex Non-Returning Regular Languages
4
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that the maximal syntactic semigroup of a non-returning language has n-1)^n elements and requires at least Ω(n 2 ) generators.
read more
Abstract: A regular language $L$ is non-returning if in the minimal deterministic finite automaton accepting it there are no transitions into the initial state. Eom, Han and Jiraskova derived upper bounds on the state complexity of boolean operations and Kleene star, and proved that these bounds are tight using two different binary witnesses. They derived upper bounds for concatenation and reversal using three different ternary witnesses. These five witnesses use a total of six different transformations. We show that for each $n\ge 4$ there exists a ternary witness of state complexity $n$ that meets the bound for reversal and that at least three letters are needed to meet this bound. Moreover, the restrictions of this witness to binary alphabets meet the bounds for product, star, and boolean operations. We also derive tight upper bounds on the state complexity of binary operations that take arguments with different alphabets. We prove that the maximal syntactic semigroup of a non-returning language has $(n-1)^n$ elements and requires at least $\binom{n}{2}$ generators. We find the maximal state complexities of atoms of non-returning languages. Finally, we show that there exists a most complex non-returning language that meets the bounds for all these complexity measures.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Complexity of Suffix-Free Regular Languages
Janusz A. Brzozowski,Marek Szykuła +1 more
- 01 Nov 2017
TL;DR: It is proved that there does not exist a most complex stream in the class of suffix-free regular languages, but one ternary suffix- free stream that meets the bound for product and whose restrictions to binary alphabets meet the bounds for star and boolean operations is exhibited.
•Posted Content
Complexity of regular bifix-free languages.
Robert Ferens,Marek Szykuła +1 more
TL;DR: A stream of bifix-free languages is presented that is most complex in terms of all basic operations, syntactic complexity, and the number of atoms and their complexities, which requires a superexponential alphabet.
3
•Posted Content
Towards a Theory of Complexity of Regular Languages
TL;DR: This work surveys recent results concerning the complexity of regular languages represented by their minimal deterministic finite automata, and turns to the study of the quotient/state complexity of common operations on regular languages: reversal, (Kleene) star, product (concatenation) and boolean operations.
3
Complexity of bifix-free regular languages
Robert Ferens,Marek Szykuła +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that there exist universal bifix-free languages that meet all the bounds for the state complexity of basic operations (Boolean operations, product, star, and reversal).
2
References
•Book
Finite automata
Dominique Perrin
- 02 Jan 1991
TL;DR: The chapter presents a complete proof of P. Schutzenberger's theorem, stating the equality between star-free sets and aperiodic sets, and describes the applications of finite automata, such as string matching or file indexing.
604
•Book
Regular languages
Sheng Yu
- 01 Apr 1997
TL;DR: The class of regular sets is the smallest class of sets containing the finite sets which is closed under union, concatenation, and Kleene closure as discussed by the authors, and it is shown that any finite set can be easily generated by a regular grammar.
522
Theory of átomata
Janusz A. Brzozowski,Hellis Tamm +1 more
- 19 Jul 2011
TL;DR: It is shown that every regular language defines a unique nondeterministic finite automaton (NFA), which is called "atomaton", whose states are the "atoms" of the language, that is, non-empty intersections of complemented or uncomplemented left quotients of thelanguage.
86
Syntactic complexity of ideal and closed languages
Janusz A. Brzozowski,Yuli Ye +1 more
- 19 Jul 2011
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that nn-1 is a tight upper bound on the complexity of right ideals and prefix-closed regular languages, and that there exist left ideals and suffix-closed languages of syntactic complexity n n-1 + n - 1, and two-sided ideals and factor-closeness of syntactically complex regular languages with state complexity nn -2 + (n - 2)2n-2 + 1.
56
Complexity of atoms, combinatorially
TL;DR: In 2014, Brzozowski and Davies characterized the most complex regular languages using the so-called "atomaton" of a regular language as discussed by the authors, and gave an alternative proof of their characterization via a purely combinatorial approach.
33
Related Papers (5)
Janusz A. Brzozowski,Sylvie Davies +1 more
- 25 Jul 2018
Janusz A. Brzozowski,Marek Szykuła +1 more
- 01 Nov 2017
Roland Cmorik,Galina Jir,skov +2 more
- 14 Oct 2011