Monitoring stellar orbits around the Massive Black Hole in the Galactic Center
Stefan Gillessen,Frank Eisenhauer,Sascha Trippe,Tal Alexander,Reinhard Genzel,Fabrice Martins,Thomas Ott +6 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the results of 16 years of monitoring stellar orbits around the massive black hole in the center of the Milky Way, using high-resolution near-infrared techniques.
read more
Abstract: We present the results of 16 years of monitoring stellar orbits around the massive black hole in the center of the Milky Way, using high-resolution near-infrared techniques. This work refines our previous analysis mainly by greatly improving the definition of the coordinate system, which reaches a long-term astrometric accuracy of 300 μas, and by investigating in detail the individual systematic error contributions. The combination of a long-time baseline and the excellent astrometric accuracy of adaptive optics data allows us to determine orbits of 28 stars, including the star S2, which has completed a full revolution since our monitoring began. Our main results are: all stellar orbits are fit extremely well by a single-point-mass potential to within the astrometric uncertainties, which are now 6× better than in previous studies. The central object mass is , where the fractional statistical error of 1.5% is nearly independent from R 0, and the main uncertainty is due to the uncertainty in R 0. Our current best estimate for the distance to the Galactic center is R 0 = 8.33 ± 0.35 kpc. The dominant errors in this value are systematic. The mass scales with distance as (3.95 ± 0.06) × 106(R 0/8 kpc)2.19 M ☉. The orientations of orbital angular momenta for stars in the central arcsecond are random. We identify six of the stars with orbital solutions as late-type stars, and six early-type stars as members of the clockwise-rotating disk system, as was previously proposed. We constrain the extended dark mass enclosed between the pericenter and apocenter of S2 at less than 0.066, at the 99% confidence level, of the mass of Sgr A*. This is two orders of magnitudes larger than what one would expect from other theoretical and observational estimates.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Narrowing the allowed mass range of ultralight bosons with the S2 star
R. Della Monica,I. De Martino +1 more
TL;DR: In this article , the S-stars in the Galactic Center are used as a new observational tool, complementary to other astrophysical systems, to narrow down the range of allowed values for an ultralight dark matter candidate boson.
7
Estimating black hole masses in obscured AGN using X-rays
TL;DR: In this paper, an X-ray-based scaling method was proposed to constrain the MBH in heavily absorbed active galactic nuclei (AGN) with good-quality hard Xray data obtained by the nuSTAR satellite and dynamically constrained from megamaser measurements.
7
ALMA Detection of Extreme Blue-Shifted Ionized Gas Within 0.2 pc of Sgr A* from -480 to -300 km/s
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used the capabilities of ALMA to probe the ionized gas towards the Galactic center with the H30alpha mm hydrogen recombination line within 30'' of the Galaxy's dynamical center.
7
On the past activity of Sgr A
Gabriele Ponti,Mark Morris,Maïca Clavel,Regis Terrier,A. Goldwurm,Simona Soldi,Richard Sturm,Frank Haberl,Kirpal Nandra +8 more
- 01 Oct 2013
TL;DR: In this article, the current constraints on Sgr A*'s past activity obtained through this method, with particular emphasis on the strong evidence that has been gathered for multiple X-ray flashes during the past few hundred years.
7
Galactic Center Research: Manifestations of the Central Black Hole
TL;DR: A review of the frontiers of Galactic center research can be found in this article, with particular attention to topics related to the Galactic black hole (GBH) and the potential for detecting the "shadow" of the GBH.
7
References
Numerical recipes in C
William H. Press,Saul A. Teukolsky,William T. Vetterling,Brian P. Flannery +3 more
- 01 Jan 1994
TL;DR: The Diskette v 2.06, 3.5''[1.44M] for IBM PC, PS/2 and compatibles [DOS] Reference Record created on 2004-09-07, modified on 2016-08-08.
Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP
Max Tegmark,Max Tegmark,Michael A. Strauss,Michael R. Blanton,Kevork N. Abazajian,Scott Dodelson,Scott Dodelson,Håvard B. Sandvik,Xiaomin Wang,David H. Weinberg,Idit Zehavi,Neta A. Bahcall,Fiona Hoyle,David J. Schlegel,Roman Scoccimarro,Michael S. Vogeley,Andreas A. Berlind,Tamás Budavári,Andrew J. Connolly,Daniel J. Eisenstein,Douglas P. Finkbeiner,Joshua A. Frieman,Joshua A. Frieman,James E. Gunn,Lam Hui,Bhuvnesh Jain,David Johnston,David Johnston,Stephen M. Kent,Huan Lin,Reiko Nakajima,Robert C. Nichol,Jeremiah P. Ostriker,Adrian Pope,Ryan Scranton,Uroš Seljak,Ravi K. Sheth,Albert Stebbins,Alexander S. Szalay,István Szapudi,Yongzhong Xu,James Annis,Jon Brinkmann,Scott Burles,Francisco J. Castander,István Csabai,Jon Loveday,Mamoru Doi,Masataka Fukugita,Bruce Gillespie,Greg Hennessy,David W. Hogg,Željko Ivezić,Gillian R. Knapp,D. Q. Lamb,Brian C. Lee,Robert H. Lupton,Timothy A. McKay,Peter Z. Kunszt,Jeffrey A. Munn,Liam O'Connell,John Peoples,Jeffrey R. Pier,Michael Richmond,Constance M. Rockosi,Donald P. Schneider,Christopher Stoughton,Douglas L. Tucker,Daniel E. Vanden Berk,Brian Yanny,Donald G. York +70 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors measured cosmological parameters using the three-dimensional power spectrum P(k) from over 200,000 galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) in combination with WMAP and other data.
An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions
TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider the problem of determining the distribution of proper motions in a line-of-sight line of sight (LoSOS) image from a given number count.
4.2K
Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals
G. J. Feldman,R. Cousins +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a classical confidence belt construction is proposed to unify the treatment of upper confidence limits for null results and two-sided confidence intervals for non-null results for Gaussian processes with background and Gaussian errors with a bounded physical region.
Related Papers (5)
Rainer Schödel,T. Ott,Reinhard Genzel,Reiner Hofmann,Matt Lehnert,Andreas Eckart,Nelly Mouawad,Tal Alexander,Mark J. Reid,Rainer Lenzen,Markus Hartung,Francois Lacombe,Daniel Rouan,Eric Gendron,Gérard Rousset,Anne-Marie Lagrange,Wolfgang Brandner,N. Ageorges,Christopher Lidman,A. F. M. Moorwood,Jason Spyromilio,Norbert Hubin,Karl M. Menten +22 more
Sheperd S. Doeleman,Jonathan Weintroub,Alan E. E. Rogers,Richard Plambeck,Robert Freund,Remo P. J. Tilanus,Per Friberg,Lucy M. Ziurys,James M. Moran,Brian E. Corey,K. Young,Daniel L. Smythe,Michael Titus,Daniel P. Marrone,Daniel P. Marrone,Roger J. Cappallo,Douglas C.-J. Bock,Geoffrey C. Bower,R. A. Chamberlin,Gary R. Davis,Thomas P. Krichbaum,James W. Lamb,H. Maness,Arthur Niell,Alan L. Roy,Peter A. Strittmatter,Dan Werthimer,Alan R. Whitney,David P. Woody +28 more