Open AccessJournal Article
Microscopic morphometry--a modern approach.
8
TL;DR: The computer-aided morphometric investigations open perspectives for operating with more expressive criteria in pathology diagnosis, resulting from the possibility to quantify, at the pixel level, features of interest which in classical approaches are subject to rough approximations.
read more
Abstract: OBJECTIVES The aim of this paper is to give a brief presentation of the recent trends in histologic and histopathologic computerized morphometry, based on the personal experience in exploiting modern software environments and illustrated by a relevant case study. Through its goal, overall conception and direct involvement in diagnosis, the work belongs to the currently emerging researches on analytical and quantitative histology. MATERIAL AND METHODS The proposed methodology for the automatic extraction of quantitative features is applied to an endometrial adenocarcinoma and is implemented as a procedure, called ADK, running on ZeissKS400 platform. The description of the ADK procedure, as a detailed flowchart, is preceded by an overview of the KS400 resources for biomedical domain, compared to the main characteristics of other three well-known software packages for digital image processing. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS The results are formulated in terms of the numerical information provided by the exploitation of ADK procedure, referring to the 2-D and 3-D (stereological) evaluation of tumorous versus stromal areas and volumes, respectively. Procedure ADK also performed measurements for the nuclei corresponding to the stromal and tumorous zones, respectively, in order to calculate the percentage of nuclei inside these zones. The discussions focus on the interpretation of the measurement results, as factors for the prognostic assessment. CONCLUSIONS The computer-aided morphometric investigations open perspectives for operating with more expressive criteria in pathology diagnosis, resulting from the possibility to quantify, at the pixel level, features of interest which in classical approaches are subject to rough approximations.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Use of quantitative analysis as a method for differentiation between canine cutaneous apocrine adenomas and apocrine carcinomas on cytological smears.
TL;DR: The results indicated that the computerized morphometry could be used as an effective auxiliary tool for differential diagnosis between canine cutaneous adenomas and carcinomas on cytological smears.
9
Quantitative morphology in canine cutaneous soft tissue sarcomas
TL;DR: The results demonstrated that the quantitative differentiation of reactive connective tissue processes from soft tissue Sarcomas in dogs is possible, but the same was not true for the different canine soft tissue sarcoma subtypes.
5
Nuclear morphometry in cytological specimens of canine ceruminous adenomas and carcinomas.
TL;DR: The results indicated that MNA, MNP, D mean, D min and D max could be used as effective auxiliary tools for differential diagnosis between canine ceruminous adenomas and adenocarcinomas, and MNA and MNP are reliable prognostic indicators for canine CeruminousAdenocARCinomas.
5
Prognostic value of nuclear morphometry in spontaneous canine sebaceous carcinomas: a preliminary report
TL;DR: Nuclear morphometry is an objective and reproducible procedure that could be used as additional tool for evaluating the metastatic potential of CSCs and significantly greater in dogs with lymph node metastases compared to parameters of tumor cells from dogs which were lymph node-negative.
3
Use of nuclear roundness as a complementary method for differentiation of benign from malignant canine mammary gland epithelial tumour on cytologic smears
R. Simeonov,G. Simeonova +1 more
- 01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: The results indicate that morphometric parameter nuclear roundness could be used as a complementary method for differentiation of benign from malignant canine mammary epithelial tumours on cytologic smears.
2