Journal Article10.1007/s11109-025-10090-y
(Media Attention to) Misinformation Can Undermine Trust in Scientists
Emma Hoes,Theresa Gessler,Sijia Qian,Magdalena Wojcieszak +3 more
TL;DR: News coverage of misinformation can erode trust in scientists, media, and professors, with exposure to coverage having comparable effects to actual misinformation, contributing to epistemic uncertainty and eroding confidence in credible sources of knowledge.
read more
Abstract: Abstract Could news coverage of misinformation be harmful? Across two studies on U.S. citizens, we examine whether news coverage of misinformation generates misperceptions and decreases levels of trust in information institutions (i.e., media, professors, and scientists) and whether its effects can be comparable to those of exposure to untrustworthy content. We rely on an online experiment using mock social media posts (Study 1, N = 1,670) and also on online behavioral tracking data paired with over-time survey self-reports (Study 2, N = 804). Study 1 finds that exposure to both actual misinformation and the coverage of misinformation affect misperceptions, but does not decrease trust. Study 2 presents evidence that behaviorally tracked visits to untrustworthy sites and exposure to news coverage of misinformation—although relatively rare—do not affect misperceptions, but both predict lower levels of trust in scientists, with less consistent effects for media and university professors. These results support concerns that not only misinformation but also its coverage contribute to epistemic uncertainty by eroding confidence in credible sources of knowledge, and warrant further inquiry into the potential harms of news media’s attention to misinformation.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
References
•Book
Mostly harmless econometrics
Joshua D. Angrist,Jörn-Steffen Pischke +1 more
- 15 Dec 2008
TL;DR: The core methods in today's econometric toolkit are linear regression for statistical control, instrumental variables methods for the analysis of natural experiments, and differences-in-differences methods that exploit policy changes as mentioned in this paper.
The science of fake news
David Lazer,Matthew A. Baum,Yochai Benkler,Adam J. Berinsky,Kelly M. Greenhill,Filippo Menczer,Miriam J. Metzger,Brendan Nyhan,Gordon Pennycook,David Rothschild,Michael Schudson,Steven A. Sloman,Cass R. Sunstein,Emily A. Thorson,Duncan J. Watts,Jonathan L. Zittrain +15 more
TL;DR: The rise of fake news highlights the erosion of long-standing institutional bulwarks against misinformation in the internet age as discussed by the authors. But much remains unknown regarding the vulnerabilities of individuals, institutions, and society to manipulations by malicious actors.
3.5K
A critique of the cross-lagged panel model.
TL;DR: This article presents an alternative model that separates the within-person process from stable between-person differences through the inclusion of random intercepts, and discusses how this model is related to existing structural equation models that include cross-lagged relationships.
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Nir Grinberg,Nir Grinberg,Kenneth Joseph,Lisa Friedland,Briony Swire-Thompson,Briony Swire-Thompson,David Lazer,David Lazer +7 more
TL;DR: Exposure to and sharing of fake news by registered voters on Twitter was examined and it was found that engagement with fake news sources was extremely concentrated and individuals most likely to engage withfake news sources were conservative leaning, older, and highly engaged with political news.
1.6K
Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.
Gordon Pennycook,David G. Rand +1 more
TL;DR: This article found that cognitive reflection test performance is negatively correlated with perceived accuracy of fake news, and positively correlated with the ability to distinguish fake news from real news, even for headlines that align with individuals' political ideology.
1.4K
