Journal Article10.1002/qre.2371
Measuring performance
185
TL;DR: Developing the right KPIs is important for promoting continuous improvement and overall business success. KPIs should be traceable to customer satisfaction and aligned with formal customer requirements. However, overemphasis on short-term financial results and collecting data that is easy to obtain, but not necessarily useful, can skew this process.
read more
Abstract: Most organizations today have a set of key performance indicators (KPIs) that are used for decision‐making. Because a balanced scorecard approach has been widely adopted, typically KPIs have moved beyond the basic financial metrics. However, developing the right set of KPIs is an important step in promoting continuous improvement and overall business success. Organization that implement six sigma or lean six sigma have a built‐in set of KPIs, such as defects, ppm defective, process yields, process cycle times, and a variety of inventory statistics, such as WIP inventory. But I don't think this goes far enough in most situations. KPIs should be traceable to customer satisfaction, both for external customers and internal ones. Organizations should formalize customer requirements and then evaluate how they are doing with respect to this list when they conduct strategic planning sessions. This is a good way to develop the right KPIs. However, overemphasis on short‐term financial results can skew this process. Too much focus on quarterly growth in sales or revenue and deflect attention from the issues that contribute to long‐ term business growth and success. Organizations often gravitate towards collecting data that is easy to obtain, but may not be necessarily useful. An example is information about customer satisfaction data. Surveys can be useful, but may not tell the complete story. One organization that I am familiar with has a customer service line. They reported very few serious complaints from that source. Analysis revealed that the average waiting time for customers that used this line
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism
TL;DR: In this paper, the effects of big data analytics on supply chain agility, supply chain adaptability, and operational performance were investigated using 281 surveys, gathered using a pre-tested questionnaire.
498
Employee participation, performance metrics, and job performance: A survey study based on self-determination theory
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that employee participation in the development of performance metrics has beneficial effects on the metrics’ quality, and shows that the subsequent effect on job performance depends on how these metrics are used.
152
Performance measurement for supply chains in the industry 4.0 era: A balanced scorecard approach
TL;DR: A theoretical approach based on the balanced scorecard (BSC) with regard to performance measurement – PM in supply chains for the Industry 4.0 era is presented and can be used as a guide to develop more effective performance measurement systems – PMSs in their organizations.
143
Barriers to and enablers of sustainability integration in the performance management systems of an oil and gas company
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the barriers to, and enablers of sustainability integration in the performance management systems of an oil and gas company, based on a qualitative case study.
138
Measuring Enterprise Sustainability
TL;DR: The paper argues that measuring enterprise sustainability requires the explicit consideration of a focal firm, its supply chain and the sustainability context within which the firm operates.
122