1. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "Measuring infrastructure: a key step in program evaluation and planning" ?
This paper describes the development of CMI measures and results of a pilot test with nine state TCP managers.. Pilot test findings indicate that the tool has good face validity and is clear and easy to follow.. The CMI tool yields data that can enhance public health efforts in a funding-constrained environment and provides insight into program sustainability.
read more
2. What have the authors stated for future works in "Measuring infrastructure: a key step in program evaluation and planning" ?
Future work will include developing measurement methods to support ongoing assessment and monitoring of program infrastructure to evaluate the predictive validity of CMI measures.. The data collected from that effort will allow for a more robust examination of the applicability of CMI measurement in all states and will allow us to examine the psychometric properties of CMI measures.. A state and national baseline description of TCP infrastructure will also allow evaluators to begin examining the association of CMI measures and program outcomes.. The authors believe the CMI approach to measuring infrastructure is generalizable to other public health programs because the model is built on work from multiple public health programs ( Lavinghouze et al., 2014 ), and the CMI measures in this study were modified after input from evaluators from diverse CDC program areas.
read more

