Journal Article10.1080/10485252.2013.810217
Local significant differences from nonparametric two-sample tests
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors establish a framework to investigate the local differences of two multivariate data samples, as measured by a statistically significant two-sample test, and identify the locally significant difference regions by computing local test statistics based on the squared difference of two kernel density estimators.
read more
Abstract: We establish a framework to investigate the local differences of two multivariate data samples, as measured by a statistically significant two-sample test. This framework identifies the locally significant difference regions by computing local test statistics based on the squared difference of two kernel density estimators. The key differences between the data samples are concentrated in these significantly different regions. We illustrate the visualisation and interpretation of local significant differences for simulated data, and their potential in the role of biomarker discovery for biological/biomedical data.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
De novo identification of differentially methylated regions in the human genome
Timothy J. Peters,Michael Buckley,Aaron L. Statham,Ruth Pidsley,Katherine Samaras,Reginald V. Lord,Susan J. Clark,Susan J. Clark,Peter L. Molloy +8 more
TL;DR: The agglomeration of genomically localised individual methylation sites into discrete DMRs is currently best served by a combination of DM-signal smoothing and subsequent threshold specification, and the design of the 450K array shows preference for CpG sites that are more likely to be differentially methylated, but its overall coverage does not adequately reflect the depth and complexity of methylation signatures afforded by sequencing.
Convergence of semantics and emotional expression within the IFG pars orbitalis.
TL;DR: The IFGorb may have initially evolved to support the comprehension of emotional signals, being later co‐opted to support semantic communication in humans by forming new connections with brain regions that formed the human semantic network.
100
Nonparametric Inference via Bootstrapping the Debiased Estimator
Gang Cheng,Yen-Chi Chen +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the debiased kernel density estimator and the local polynomial regression estimator are combined to construct confidence bands by bootstrapping, and the confidence band is asymptotically valid.
Statistical inference using the Morse-Smale complex
TL;DR: In this paper, the Morse-Smale complex of a function is used to decompose the sample space into cells where the density of the function is increasing or decreasing, which provides a way to represent, visualize, and compare multivariate functions.
•Posted Content
Statistical Inference using the Morse-Smale Complex
TL;DR: This paper develops two new methods based on the Morse-Smale complex: a visualization technique for multivariate functions and a two-sample, multivariate hypothesis test.
References
On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode
TL;DR: In this paper, the problem of the estimation of a probability density function and of determining the mode of the probability function is discussed. Only estimates which are consistent and asymptotically normal are constructed.
A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
TL;DR: In this article, a simple procedure for multiple tests of significance based on individual p-values is derived, which is sharper than Holm's (1979) sequentially rejective procedure.
Multivariate Density Estimation, Theory, Practice and Visualization
TL;DR: Representation and Geometry of Multivariate Data.
4.5K
•Book
Nonparametric Statistical Inference
Jean D. Gibbons,Subhabrata Chakraborti +1 more
- 01 Dec 1971
TL;DR: Theoretical Bases for Calculating the ARE Examples of the Calculations of Efficacy and ARE Analysis of Count Data.
3.1K