Ligand activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor β inhibits colon carcinogenesis

TL;DR: This paper showed that ligand activation of PPARβ attenuates chemically induced colon carcinogenesis and that PPARbeta-dependent induction of cathepsin E could explain the reported disparity in the literature about the effect of ligand activations in the intestine.

Abstract: There is considerable debate whether peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta (PPARbeta/delta) ligands potentiate or suppress colon carcinogenesis. Whereas administration of a PPARbeta ligand causes increased small intestinal tumorigenesis in Apc(min/+) mice, PPARbeta-null (Pparb-/-) mice exhibit increased colon polyp multiplicity in colon cancer bioassays, suggesting that ligand activation of this receptor will inhibit colon carcinogenesis. This hypothesis was examined by treating wild-type (Pparb+/+) and Pparb-/- with azoxymethane, coupled with a highly specific PPARbeta ligand, GW0742. Ligand activation of PPARbeta in Pparb+/+ mice caused an increase in the expression of mRNA encoding adipocyte differentiation-related protein, fatty acid-binding protein, and cathepsin E. These findings are indicative of colonocyte differentiation, which was confirmed by immunohistochemical analysis. No PPARbeta-dependent differences in replicative DNA synthesis or expression of phosphatase and tensin homologue, phosphoinositide-dependent kinase, integrin-linked kinase, or phospho-Akt were detected in ligand-treated mouse colonic epithelial cells although increased apoptosis was found in GW0742-treated Pparb+/+ mice. Consistent with increased colonocyte differentiation and apoptosis, inhibition of colon polyp multiplicity was also found in ligand-treated Pparb+/+ mice, and all of these effects were not found in Pparb-/- mice. In contrast to previous reports suggesting that activation of PPARbeta potentiates intestinal tumorigenesis, here we show that ligand activation of PPARbeta attenuates chemically induced colon carcinogenesis and that PPARbeta-dependent induction of cathepsin E could explain the reported disparity in the literature about the effect of ligand activation of PPARbeta in the intestine.