Journal Article10.1051/0004-6361/202347540
Leptohadronic multi-messenger modeling of 324 gamma-ray blazars
Xavier Rodrigues,Vaidehi S. Paliya,Simone Garrappa,A. Omeliukh,Anna Franckowiak,Walter Winter +5 more
- 24 Jul 2023
TL;DR: The multi-messenger modeling of 324 gamma-ray blazars provides insights into the relationship between neutrino production and the multiwavelength spectrum of active galaxies. The results suggest that blazars that are brighter in gamma rays have a higher neutrino production efficiency but a lower best-fit baryonic loading.
read more
Abstract: The origin of the diffuse astrophysical neutrino flux observed by the IceCube experiment is still under debate. Multiple associations have been reported between high-energy neutrino events and individual blazars, such as the source TXS 0506+056, which are active galaxies with relativistic jets pointing toward Earth. From a theoretical perspective, the properties of these sources as neutrino emitters are not yet well understood. By systematically modeling the effect of cosmic-ray protons on the multiwavelength data from the largest sample of bright gamma-ray blazars to date, we expect to learn about the multi-messenger nature of the active galaxy population as a whole, as well as the relationship between neutrino production and the multiwavelength spectrum of these sources. We predict the emitted multiwavelength and neutrino spectrum using a self-consistent numerical radiation model applied individually to each source in the sample. We then study the properties of the full population and identify empirical relations.
We focus on public multiwavelength data from the radio to the gamma-ray bands from a sample of 324 blazars detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT), most of which are flat-spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs). This amounts to 34 of all FSRQs in the latest Fermi catalog. We demonstrate that the optical and gigaelectronvolt gamma-ray broadband features are generally well described by electron emission, which helps for the location of the emission region relative to the central black hole to be constrained. For 33 of the blazars in our sample, a description of the observed X-ray spectrum benefits from an additional component from proton interactions, in agreement with recent studies of individual IceCube candidate blazars. We show that, on average, blazars that are brighter in gigaelectronvolt gamma rays have a higher neutrino production efficiency but a lower best-fit baryonic loading. The predicted neutrino luminosity shows a positive correlation both with the observed flux of gigaelectronvolt gamma rays and with the predicted flux of megaelectronvolt gamma rays. We also estimate the diffuse neutrino flux from gamma-ray blazars by extrapolating the result to the Fermi population, and we show that it may be at the level of sim 20 of the diffuse neutrino flux observed by IceCube, in agreement with current limits from stacking analyses. We discuss the implications of our results for future neutrino searches and suggest promising sources for potential detections.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Figures

Fig. 2. Schematic representation of two different geometries of the one-zone FSRQ model. The broad line region is represented by the purple clouds. In the case of the blob represented on the left, its proximity to the BLR implies a large relative Doppler factor, meaning the external fields appear highly boosted in the jet frame (compare left-hand plot, where the external fields are shown in the rest frame of the central engine, with the middle plot, where they are shown as energy density spectra in the jet frame). In the case represented on the right, due to the high dissipation radius Rdiss the BLR photons impinge more from behind and the external fields from the BLR are less boosted, as shown in the lower right plot. The relativistic boosting of these external radiation fields follows the treatment by Ghisellini & Tavecchio (2009). 
Fig. 3. Flowchart of the fitting procedure. The leptohadronic fit of each source data is performed as a three-step process. The initial step, where the optical and gamma ray broadband features are explained with a leptonic model, requires the most simulations because the vast parameter space is initially unconstrained. The number of CPU-hours quoted refers to the entire sample and is based on the code’s performance of 1.6 s for a single leptonic simulation and ∼20 s for a leptohadronic simulation. 
Fig. 6. Best-fit results of the 10 sources in the sample with the highest predicted neutrino fluxes. The plots are ordered by total predicted neutrino, as in Tab. B.1, here from left to right and top to bottom. The blue curves show the multi-wavelength emission predicted by the full leptohadronic model. The best-fit baryonic loading value is provided in the caption and can also be found in Tab. B.1). The orange curves on the right-hand side of each panel show the best-fit emitted all-flavor neutrino fluxes, as discussed in Section 3.2. The corresponding plot for all modeled sources, as well as the numerical data, can be found in the online repository https://github.com/xrod/lephad-blazars. 
Fig. 11. All-flavor neutrino flux expected from the entire sample (solid black curve), separated into FSRQs (solid purple curve) and BL Lacs (solid green curve). Following the sampling method described in the main text, we then extrapolate the result to the entire Fermi-LAT blazar sample and obtain the diffuse spectrum shown as a dotted curve. For visual reference, the individual contributions are represented as thin curves (see also Tab. B.1). The black data points show IceCube data from the analysis by Aartsen et al. (2015a) and the blue curve shows the 9 year IceCube sensitivity (Aartsen et al. 2018). In pink we show the stacking limits derived for blazars by Aartsen et al. (2017b). 
Fig. 10. Number of events per year in IceCube (left) and in the future IceCube-Gen2 (right) predicted by the model as function of each source’s gamma-ray flux. Here we include only those sources for which the best-fit result is incompatible with zero baryonic loading within the 1σ region. The name of each associated source is shown for reference (cf. Tab. B.1). Green points denote FSRQs and purple points denote BL Lacs. 
Fig. A.1. Comparison between the results obtained in this work and ten selected results from recent multi-wavelength studies, in chronological order of publication (Boettcher et al. 2013; Petropoulou 2014; Gao et al. 2017; Petropoulou et al. 2017; Banik et al. 2020; Oikonomou et al. 2021; Gasparyan et al. 2021; Sahakyan et al. 2022, 2023). In blue and orange we show respectively the best-fit photon and neutrino fluxes from the current model; the dashed magenta and green curves show the photon and neutrino spectra (when available) predicted by previous works. The magenta points represent the data fitted in the respective study, which in some cases varies significantly from the current work because of time-domain selection. The best-fit baryonic loading values are given in each caption. Article number, page 21 of 28
Citations
The Awakening of a Blazar at Redshift 2.7 Temporally Coincident with the Arrival of Cospatial Neutrino Event IceCube-201221A
Xiong Jiang,Neng-Hui Liao,Yibo Wang,Rui Xue,Ning Jiang,Tingui Wang +5 more
TL;DR: The blazar NVSS J171822+423948 is the first candidate for a neutrino-emitting blazar at redshift above 2.
4
Modeling Blazar Broadband Emission with a Convolutional Neural Network. I. Synchrotron Self-Compton Model
Damien Bégué,N. Sahakyan,Hüsne Dereli-Bégué,P. Giommi,Sargis Gasparyan,M. Khachatryan,A. Casotto,Asaf Pe’er +7 more
TL;DR: A novel method for modeling blazar broadband emission with a convolutional neural network is presented. The model incorporates synchrotron, inverse Compton, self-consistent electron cooling, and pair creation–annihilation processes. The method significantly reduces computational time and enables real-time fitting to multiwavelength data sets.
3
The Spectra of IceCube Neutrino (SIN) candidate sources. V. Modeling and interpretation of multiwavelength and neutrino data
Xavier Rodrigues,Martina Karl,P. Padovani,P. Giommi,S. Paiano,R. Falomo,M. Petropoulou,F. Oikonomou +7 more
TL;DR: The multiwavelength and neutrino data from blazar sources associated with IceCube events are well described by a single-zone leptohadronic model.
Optical spectroscopic classification of a selection of Southern Hemisphere 3FHL blazar candidates
Johannes Petrus Marais,B. van Soelen +1 more
TL;DR: This study classifies 12 Southern Hemisphere blazar candidates as BL Lac objects using optical spectroscopy, determining redshifts for 7, and contributes to improving understanding of extra-galactic γ-ray sources and identifying new high-energy source classes.
Sources of high-energy neutrinos
Walter Winter
- 08 May 2024
TL;DR: Recent neutrino astronomy results suggest high-energy neutrinos originate from relativistic outflows in Active Galactic Nuclei, Gamma-Ray Bursts, and Tidal Disruption Events, with implications for Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays and particle acceleration mechanisms.
References
Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning
David E. Goldberg
- 01 Jan 1989
TL;DR: This book brings together the computer techniques, mathematical tools, and research results that will enable both students and practitioners to apply genetic algorithms to problems in many fields.
58.6K
The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Mission
W. B. Atwood,A. A. Abdo,A. A. Abdo,Markus Ackermann,W. Althouse,Brandon Anderson,Magnus Axelsson,Luca Baldini,Jean Ballet,David L. Band,Guido Barbiellini,Guido Barbiellini,J. Bartelt,Denis Bastieri,Denis Bastieri,B. M. Baughman,Keith Bechtol,D. Bédérède,F. Bellardi,Ronaldo Bellazzini,B. Berenji,Giovanni F. Bignami,Dario Bisello,Dario Bisello,Elisabetta Bissaldi,Roger Blandford,E. D. Bloom,J. R. Bogart,Emanuele Bonamente,Emanuele Bonamente,Jerry T. Bonnell,A. W. Borgland,A. Bouvier,Johan Bregeon,Alessandro Brez,M. Brigida,M. Brigida,P. Bruel,T. H. Burnett,G. Busetto,G. Busetto,G. A. Caliandro,G. A. Caliandro,R. A. Cameron,P. A. Caraveo,Staffan Carius,P. Carlson,J. M. Casandjian,E. Cavazzuti,M. Ceccanti,C. Cecchi,C. Cecchi,Eric Charles,A. Chekhtman,A. Chekhtman,C. C. Cheung,James Chiang,R. Chipaux,A. N. Cillis,Stefano Ciprini,Stefano Ciprini,R. Claus,Johann Cohen-Tanugi,S. Condamoor,Jan Conrad,Jan Conrad,Robin H. D. Corbet,L. Corucci,L. Costamante,S. Cutini,David S. Davis,David S. Davis,D. Decotigny,M. Deklotz,Charles D. Dermer,A. De Angelis,Seth Digel,E. Do Couto E Silva,Persis S. Drell,R. Dubois,D. Dumora,D. Dumora,Y. Edmonds,D. Fabiani,Christian Farnier,C. Favuzzi,C. Favuzzi,D. L. Flath,P. Fleury,W. B. Focke,Stefan Funk,P. Fusco,P. Fusco,F. Gargano,Dario Gasparrini,Neil Gehrels,Neil Gehrels,F.-X. Gentit,S. Germani,S. Germani,B. Giebels,Nicola Giglietto,Nicola Giglietto,Paolo Giommi,F. Giordano,F. Giordano,T. Glanzman,G. Godfrey,I. A. Grenier,M.-H. Grondin,M.-H. Grondin,J. E. Grove,L. Guillemot,L. Guillemot,S. Guiriec,Gunther Haller,Alice K. Harding,P. A. Hart,E. Hays,S. E. Healey,M. Hirayama,M. Hirayama,L. Hjalmarsdotter,R. Horn,R. E. Hughes,Gudlaugur Johannesson,G. Johansson,A. S. Johnson,R. P. Johnson,Tyrel J. Johnson,Tyrel J. Johnson,W. N. Johnson,T. Kamae,Hideaki Katagiri,Jun Kataoka,A. Kavelaars,Nobuyuki Kawai,H. Kelly,Matthew Kerr,Wlodzimierz Klamra,Jürgen Knödlseder,Martin Kocian,N. Komin,N. Komin,F. Kuehn,M. Kuss,D. Landriu,Luca Latronico,B. Lee,Shiu-Hang Lee,Marianne Lemoine-Goumard,Marianne Lemoine-Goumard,Andrea Lionetto,Andrea Lionetto,Francesco Longo,Francesco Longo,F. Loparco,F. Loparco,Benoit Lott,Benoit Lott,M. N. Lovellette,P. Lubrano,P. Lubrano,G. M. Madejski,A. Makeev,A. Makeev,B. Marangelli,B. Marangelli,M.M. Massai,M. N. Mazziotta,Julie McEnery,N. Menon,C. Meurer,Peter F. Michelson,Massimo Minuti,N. Mirizzi,N. Mirizzi,W. Mitthumsiri,Tsunefumi Mizuno,A. A. Moiseev,C. Monte,C. Monte,M. E. Monzani,Elena Moretti,Elena Moretti,A. Morselli,A. Morselli,Igor V. Moskalenko,S. Murgia,Takeshi Nakamori,Sho Nishino,P. L. Nolan,J. P. Norris,Eric Nuss,Masanori Ohno,T. Ohsugi,Nicola Omodei,E. Orlando,J. F. Ormes,Alessandro Paccagnella,Alessandro Paccagnella,David Paneque,J. H. Panetta,D. Parent,D. Parent,Mark Pearce,M. Pepe,M. Pepe,A. Perazzo,Melissa Pesce-Rollins,P. Picozza,P. Picozza,L. Pieri,Michele Pinchera,F. Piron,T. A. Porter,L. Poupard,S. Rainò,S. Rainò,Robert R. Rando,Robert R. Rando,E. Rapposelli,M. Razzano,A. Reimer,Olaf Reimer,T. Reposeur,T. Reposeur,L. C. Reyes,S. Ritz,S. Ritz,L. S. Rochester,A. Y. Rodriguez,Roger W. Romani,M. Roth,J. J. Russell,Felix Ryde,S. Sabatini,S. Sabatini,Hartmut Sadrozinski,David Sanchez,A. Sander,L. Sapozhnikov,P. M. Saz Parkinson,Jeffrey D. Scargle,T. L. Schalk,G. Scolieri,Carmelo Sgrò,Gerald H. Share,Gerald H. Share,M. S. Shaw,Takashi Shimokawabe,Chris Shrader,Agnieszka Sierpowska-Bartosik,E. J. Siskind,David A. Smith,David A. Smith,P. D. Smith,Gloria Spandre,P. Spinelli,P. Spinelli,Jean-Luc Starck,T. E. Stephens,M. S. Strickman,Andrew W. Strong,D. J. Suson,Hiroyasu Tajima,Hiromitsu Takahashi,Tadayuki Takahashi,Takaaki Tanaka,A. Tenze,S. Tether,J. B. Thayer,J. G. Thayer,D. J. Thompson,L. Tibaldo,L. Tibaldo,O. Tibolla,Diego F. Torres,Diego F. Torres,Gino Tosti,Gino Tosti,A. Tramacere,M. Turri,T. L. Usher,N. Vilchez,V. Vitale,V. Vitale,P. Wang,K. Watters,Brian L Winer,K. S. Wood,T. Ylinen,M. Ziegler +292 more
TL;DR: The Large Area Telescope (Fermi/LAT) as mentioned in this paper is the primary instrument on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, which is an imaging, wide field-of-view, high-energy gamma-ray telescope, covering the energy range from below 20 MeV to more than 300 GeV.
4.7K
The Swift X-ray telescope
David N. Burrows,Joanne E. Hill,John A. Nousek,J. A. Kennea,Alan A. Wells,J. P. Osborne,A. F. Abbey,A. P. Beardmore,K. Mukerjee,A. Short,Guido Chincarini,Sergio Campana,Oberto Citterio,Alberto Moretti,C. Pagani,Gianpiero Tagliaferri,Paolo Giommi,M. Capalbi,F. Tamburelli,Lorella Angelini,Giancarlo Cusumano,Heinrich Bräuninger,Wolfgang Burkert,Gisela Hartner +23 more
- 01 Jan 2005
TL;DR: The Swift Gamma-Ray Explorer (XRT) as mentioned in this paper uses a mirror set built for JET-X and an XMM-Newton/EPIC MOS CCD detector to provide a sensitive broad-band (0.2-10 keV) X-ray imager with effective area of > 120 cm2 at 1.5 keV, field of view of 23.6 × 23. 6 arcminutes, and angular resolution of 18 arcseconds.
2.7K
THE NUCLEAR SPECTROSCOPIC TELESCOPE ARRAY (NuSTAR) HIGH-ENERGY X-RAY MISSION
Fiona A. Harrison,William W. Craig,William W. Craig,Finn Erland Christensen,Charles J. Hailey,William W. Zhang,Steven E. Boggs,Daniel Stern,W. Rick Cook,Karl Forster,Paolo Giommi,Brian W. Grefenstette,Yunjin Kim,Takao Kitaguchi,Jason E. Koglin,Kristin K. Madsen,Peter H. Mao,Hiromasa Miyasaka,Kaya Mori,M. Perri,Michael J. Pivovaroff,Simonetta Puccetti,Vikram Rana,Niels Jørgen Stenfeldt Westergaard,J. L. Willis,Andreas Zoglauer,Hongjun An,Matteo Bachetti,Matteo Bachetti,Nicolas M. Barrière,Eric C. Bellm,Varun Bhalerao,Varun Bhalerao,Nicolai Brejnholt,Felix Fuerst,Carl Christian Liebe,Craig B. Markwardt,Melania Nynka,Julia Vogel,Dominic J. Walton,Daniel R. Wik,David M. Alexander,L. R. Cominsky,Ann Hornschemeier,Allan Hornstrup,Victoria M. Kaspi,Greg Madejski,Giorgio Matt,S. Molendi,David M. Smith,John A. Tomsick,Marco Ajello,David R. Ballantyne,Mislav Baloković,Didier Barret,Didier Barret,Franz E. Bauer,Roger Blandford,W. Niel Brandt,Laura Brenneman,James Chiang,Deepto Chakrabarty,Jérôme Chenevez,Andrea Comastri,Francois Dufour,Martin Elvis,Andrew C. Fabian,Duncan Farrah,Chris L. Fryer,Eric V. Gotthelf,Jonathan E. Grindlay,D. J. Helfand,Roman Krivonos,David L. Meier,Jon M. Miller,Lorenzo Natalucci,Patrick Ogle,Eran O. Ofek,Andrew Ptak,Stephen P. Reynolds,Jane R. Rigby,Gianpiero Tagliaferri,Stephen E. Thorsett,Ezequiel Treister,C. Megan Urry +84 more
TL;DR: The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) as discussed by the authors is the first focusing high-energy X-ray telescope in orbit, which operates in the band from 3 to 79 keV.
The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope
Peter W. A. Roming,T. Kennedy,Keith O. Mason,John A. Nousek,Lindy Ahr,Richard E. Bingham,Patrick S. Broos,M. Carter,B. Hancock,H. E. Huckle,S. D. Hunsberger,H. Kawakami,Ronnie Killough,T. Scott Koch,M. McLelland,Kelly D. Smith,Philip J. Smith,Juan Carlos Soto,Patricia T. Boyd,A. A. Breeveld,Stephen T. Holland,M. Ivanushkina,Michael S. Pryzby,Martin Still,Joseph Stock +24 more
TL;DR: The Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) as discussed by the authors is one of the three instruments flying aboard the Swift Gamma-ray Observatory, which is designed to capture the early (∼1 min) UV and optical photons from the afterglow of gamma-ray bursts in the 170-600 nm band as well as long term observations of these afterglows.
2.1K