Journal Article10.1016/0090-2616(85)90028-2
Leadership: Good, better, best.
1.1K
About: This article is published in Organizational Dynamics. The article was published on 01 Dec 1985. The article focuses on the topics: Leadership style.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Review of Leadership Styles in Perspective of Dynamic Capabilities: An Empirical Research on Managers in Manufacturing Firms
Bülent Akkaya
- 23 Mar 2020
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the leadership dimensions and a related framework for assessing leadership styles, in relation to the context in which the leader works in dynamic environment, and examine the relative impact of different types of leadership on firms' dynamic capabilities.
The relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership styles in the South African petrochemical industry
TL;DR: In this paper, a study was conducted to determine the relationship between self-reported emotional intelligence and leadership styles in a South African context and to determine whether emotional intelligence can predict an effective leadership style.
What works for mental health system change: evolution or revolution?
TL;DR: All stakeholder groups need to become strategic about system change so that real-world practices keep up with the ideals emerging in practice guidelines and evidence-based practice reviews.
35
Leadership in the Innovation Era: Transactional or Transformational Style?
Arman Syah Putra,Hatoli Waruwu,Masduki Asbari,Dewiana Novitasari,Agus Purwanto +4 more
- 01 Jan 2020
TL;DR: In this paper, the influence of transactional and transformational leadership on lecturer innovation capability was measured and compared by using simple random sampling to the lecturer population of private higher education in Indonesia.
References
•Book
A Theory of Human Motivation
Abraham H. Maslow
- 01 Jan 2013
Abstract: 1. The integrated wholeness of the organism must be one of the foundation stones of motivation theory. 2. The hunger drive (or any other physiological drive) was rejected as a centering point or model for a definitive theory of motivation. Any drive that is somatically based and localizable was shown to be atypical rather than typical in human motivation. 3. Such a theory should stress and center itself upon ultimate or basic goals rather than partial or superficial ones, upon ends rather than means to these ends. Such a stress would imply a more central place for unconscious than for conscious motivations. 4. There are usually available various cultural paths to the same goal. Therefore conscious, specific, local-cultural desires are not as fundamental in motivation theory as the more basic, unconscious goals. 5. Any motivated behavior, either preparatory or consummatory, must be understood to be a channel through which many basic needs may be simultaneously expressed or satisfied. Typically an act has more than one motivation. 6. Practically all organismic states are to be understood as motivated and as motivating. 7. Human needs arrange themselves in hierarchies of prepotency. That is to say, the appearance of one need usually rests on the prior satisfaction of another, more pre-potent need. Man is a perpetually wanting animal. Also no need or drive can be treated as if it were isolated or discrete; every drive is related to the state of satisfaction or dissatisfaction of other drives. 8. Lists of drives will get us nowhere for various theoretical and practical reasons. Furthermore any classification of motivations
19.7K
Effects of leader contingent and noncontingent reward and punishment behaviors on subordinate performance and satisfaction.
TL;DR: Only performance-contingent reward behavior was found to affect subordinate performance significantly and positive relationships were found between leader contingent reward behavior and employee satisfaction.
Dimensionality of leader—subordinate interactions: A path—goal investigation
Janet Fulk,Eric R. Wendler +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed predictions from path-goal theory for four under-researched leader behaviors and tested via canonical analysis, concluding that satisfaction is the primary subordinate outcome for these four leader behaviors, and unless its effects are isolated (via a technique such as canonical analysis), the effects for other subordinate outcomes may not be accurately described.
92
A role set analysis of managerial reputation
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed that focal managers gain the reputation of being effective by meeting the self-interested expectations of role set members, and further proposed that the most reputationally effective managers tend to be more successful in their careers than the least reputational effective managers.