Journal Article10.1108/01437720710755272
Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study
TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper examined the influence of individual factors (enjoyment in helping others and knowledge self-efficacy), organizational factors (top management support and organizational rewards) and technology factors (information and communication technology use) on knowledge sharing processes and whether more leads to superior firm innovation capability.
read more
Abstract: Purpose – The study sets out to examine the influence of individual factors (enjoyment in helping others and knowledge self‐efficacy), organizational factors (top management support and organizational rewards) and technology factors (information and communication technology use) on knowledge sharing processes and whether more leads to superior firm innovation capability. Design/methodology/approach – Based on a survey of 172 employees from 50 large organizations in Taiwan, this study applies the structural equation modeling (SEM) to investigate the research model. Findings – The results show that two individual factors (enjoyment in helping others and knowledge self‐efficacy) and one of the organizational factors (top management support) significantly influence knowledge‐sharing processes. The results also indicate that employee willingness to both donate and collect knowledge enable the firm to improve innovation capability. Research limitations/implications – Future research can examine how personal traits (such as age, level of education, and working experiences) and organizational characteristics (such as firm size and industry type) may moderate the relationships between knowledge enablers and processes. Practical implications – From a practical perspective, the relationships among knowledge‐sharing enablers, processes, and firm innovation capability may provide a clue regarding how firms can promote knowledge‐sharing culture to sustain their innovation performance. Originality/value – The findings of this study provide a theoretical basis, and simultaneously can be used to analyze relationships among knowledge‐sharing factors, including enablers, processes, and firm innovation capability. From a managerial perspective, this study identified several factors essential to successful knowledge sharing, and discussed the implications of these factors for developing organizational strategies that encourage and foster knowledge sharing.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Organizational Culture as Determinant of Knowledge Sharing Practices of Teachers Working in Higher Education Sector.
Santhosh Areekkuzhiyil
- 01 Aug 2016
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored the influence of organisational culture on knowledge sharing practices of teachers working in higher education sector and found that the organizational culture explain 35.9 % of the knowledge sharing behaviors of teachers.
Factors influencing knowledge sharing among IT geographically dispersed teams
TL;DR: In this article, the authors use a sample of 87 IT Portuguese professionals who work on geographically dispersed teams to test a conceptual model with partial least squares (PLS) and use importance-performance map analysis (IPMA) to analyze differences in subgroups of the sample.
5
•Dissertation
A framework to support intra- organisational knowledge sharing in HIV/AIDS NGOs in South Africa
R. Sassman
- 01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s).
5
Knowledge Management and Perceived Organisational Innovativeness in Global Organisations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined how knowledge management is associated with perceived organisational innovativeness in global companies operating in Central European country and what role in this relationship is played by organisational environment stimulants.
Business processes modelling in knowledge management perspective
Agnieszka Bitkowska
- 01 Apr 2017
TL;DR: The main objective of as mentioned in this paper is to identify the business process modelling in knowledge management perspective in contemporary organizations, which is considered to be an up-to-date approach to an organization's operation, while process structures offer a sense of order.
5
References
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Claes Fornell,David F. Larcker +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the statistical tests used in the analysis of structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error are examined, and a drawback of the commonly applied chi square test, in additit...
63.5K
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Michael W. Browne,Robert Cudeck +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, two types of error involved in fitting a model are considered, error of approximation and error of fit, where the first involves the fit of the model, and the second involves the model's shape.
29.4K
On the evaluation of structural equation models
Richard P. Bagozzi,Youjae Yi +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, structural equation models with latent variables are defined, critiqued, and illustrated, and an overall program for model evaluation is proposed based upon an interpretation of converging and diverging evidence.
21.2K
•Book
Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory
Albert Bandura
- 11 Oct 1985
TL;DR: In this paper, models of Human Nature and Casualty are used to model human nature and human health, and a set of self-regulatory mechanisms are proposed. But they do not consider the role of cognitive regulators.
11.2K
Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation
TL;DR: In this paper, a multidimensional measure of psychological empowerment in the workplace has been developed and validated using second-order confirmatory factor analysis with two complementary samples to demonstrate the convergent and discriminant validity of four dimensions of empowerment.
6.6K