Knowledge Practices in Design: The Role of Visual Representations as `Epistemic Objects'
Boris Ewenstein,Jennifer Whyte +1 more
TL;DR: The epistemic role of objects is highlighted, using observations of knowledge work on an architectural design project to show how, in this setting, visual representations are characterized by a `lack' or incompleteness that precipitates unfolding.
read more
Abstract: We use a detailed study of the knowledge work around visual representations to draw attention to the multidimensional nature of `objects'. Objects are variously described in the literatures as relatively stable or in flux; as abstract or concrete; and as used within or across practices. We clarify these dimensions, drawing on and extending the literature on boundary objects, and connecting it with work on epistemic and technical objects. In particular, we highlight the epistemic role of objects, using our observations of knowledge work on an architectural design project to show how, in this setting, visual representations are characterized by a `lack' or incompleteness that precipitates unfolding. The conceptual design of a building involves a wide range of technical, social and aesthetic forms of knowledge that need to be developed and aligned. We explore how visual representations are used, and how these are meaningful to different stakeholders, eliciting their distinct contributions. As the project evo...
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I
TL;DR: The term design thinking has gained attention over the past decade in a wide range of contexts beyond the traditional preoccupations of designers as discussed by the authors, the main idea is that the ways professional design...
959
Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration
TL;DR: A case is made for the use of multiple theoretical perspectives—theory on boundary objects, epistemic objects, cultural historical activity theory, and objects as infrastructure—to understand the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration and develops a novel analytical framework that organizes objects according to the active work they perform.
Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice
Paula Jarzabkowski,Sarah Kaplan +1 more
TL;DR: In response to critiques of strategy tools as unhelpful or potentially dangerous for organizations, a sociological eye is suggested on how tools are actually mobilized by strategy makers, offering a framework for examining the ways that the affordances of strategy tool and the agency of strategy makers interact to shape how and when tools are selected and applied.
Organizing Thoughts and Connecting Brains: Material Practices and the Transition from Individual to Group-Level Prospective Sensemaking
Ileana Stigliani,Davide Ravasi +1 more
TL;DR: This paper developed a process model that accounts for the interplay between conversational and material practices in the transition from individual to group-level sensemaking, and unpack how the materialization of cognitive work supports the collective construction of new shared understandings.
443
The Visual Dimension in Organizing, Organization, and Organization Research: Core Ideas, Current Developments, and Promising Avenues
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present five distinct approaches to feature visuals in research designs and to include the visual dimension in scholarly inquiry, and introduce methodological and theoretical roots of visual studies in a number of disciplines that have a long-standing tradition of incorporating the visual.
419
References
Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries
TL;DR: The paper examines managing knowledge across boundaries in settings where innovation is desired and how this relates to the common knowledge that actors use to share and assess each other's domain-specific knowledge.
The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach
TL;DR: Firms are distributed knowledge systems in a strong sense: they are decentered systems, iacking an overseeing 'mind'; the knowledge they need to draw upon is inherently indeterminate and continually emerging.
Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor
TL;DR: This paper links the misunderstandings between engineers, technicians, and assemblers on a production floor to their work contexts, and demonstrates how members of these communities overcome such problems by cocreating common ground that transforms their understanding of the product and the production process.