Iterative Antirandom Testing
TL;DR: An iterative application of the short antirandom tests where the first test vector in each iteration is generated randomly, and a new metric the Maximal Minimal Hamming Distance (MMHD) is proposed which allows us to define an optimal antIRandom test with restricted number of patterns.
read more
Abstract: Antirandom testing is a variation of pure random testing, which is the process of generating random patterns and applying it to a system under test (both software systems and hardware systems) However, research studies have shown that pure random testing is relatively less effective at fault detection than other testing techniques Antirandom testing improves the fault-detection capability of random testing by employing the location information of previously executed test cases In antirandom testing we select test case such that it is as different as possible from all the previous executed test cases Unfortunately, this method essentially requires enumeration of the input space and computation of each input pattern when used on an arbitrary set of existing test data This avoids scale-up to large test sets and (or) long input vectors The objective of this paper is to find a more efficient method of the test generation which does not need any computation The key idea of proposed approach is an iterative application of the short antirandom tests where the first test vector in each iteration is generated randomly Moreover, we propose a new metric the Maximal Minimal Hamming Distance (MMHD) which allows us to define an optimal antirandom test with restricted number of patterns Experimental results are given to evaluate the performance of the new approach
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Multi-Run March Tests for Pattern Sensitive Faults in RAM
Eugenia Busłowska,Vyacheslav N. Yarmolik +1 more
- 01 Sep 2018
TL;DR: The efficiency of the test sessions is compared based on a diverse set of march tests based on the Weighted Fault Coverage measure and the random background changes.
8
Methods of Synthesis of Controlled Random Tests
Ireneusz Mrozek,Vyacheslav N. Yarmolik +1 more
- 14 Sep 2016
TL;DR: A method for synthesizing multiple controlled random tests based on the use of the initial random test and addition operation has been proposed and the resulting multiple tests can be interpreted as a single controlled random test.
7
Controlled method of random test synthesis
TL;DR: A method for synthesizing multiple controlled random tests based on the use of the initial random test and addition operation has been proposed, and the resulting multiple tests can be interpreted as a single controlled random test.
6
Pseudo-Exhaustive Random Access Memory Testing Based on March Tests with Random Background Variation
Ireneusz Mrozek,Vyacheslav N. Yarmolik +1 more
- 01 Sep 2018
TL;DR: A new concept for pseudo exhaustive computer memory testing based on multi-run march tests with random backgrounds is introduced and the analytical estimation as the approximation of the pseudo-exhaustive test complexity based on the Coupon Collector's Problem is obtained.
5
Optimal Controlled Random Tests
Ireneusz Mrozek,Vyacheslav N. Yarmolik +1 more
- 16 Jun 2017
TL;DR: This paper proposes the algorithm for optimal controlled random tests generation and shows the high efficiency of proposed solution especially for the multi-run tests with small number of iterations.
References
Error detecting and error correcting codes
TL;DR: The author was led to the study given in this paper from a consideration of large scale computing machines in which a large number of operations must be performed without a single error in the end result.
Error detecting and error correcting codes
Neha Chauhan,Pooja Yadav,Preeti Kumari +2 more
- 01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: In this paper all error detecting and error correcting mechanisms are studied and best mechanism on the basis of accuracy, complexity and power consumption is selected.
3.5K
Combination Testing Strategies : A Survey
TL;DR: This survey describes the basic algorithms used by the combination strategies and includes a subsumption hierarchy that attempts to relate the various coverage criteria associated with the identified combination strategies.
491
Adaptive random testing
TL;DR: Results show that adaptive random testing does outperform ordinary random testing significantly (by up to as much as 50%) for the set of programs under study, providing evidences that the intuition is likely to be useful in improving the effectiveness of random testing.
422
Adaptive Random Testing: The ART of test case diversity
TL;DR: A synthesis of the most important research results related to Adaptive Random Testing (ART) is presented, particularly note the fundamental role of diversity in test case selection strategies.
340