Journal Article10.1037/H0068663
Interpretation of educational measurements.
342
About: This article is published in Journal of Applied Psychology. The article was published on 01 Jan 1928. The article focuses on the topics: Interpretation (philosophy).
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
The Logic of Latent Variable Analysis as Validity Evidence in Psychological Measurement
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the rationale behind model fitting and its use as validity evidence for a test and the purpose of why the fit of data to a latent trait model counts as valid evidence for the test.
Foundations of Arrogance: A Broad Survey and Framework for Research.
Nelson Cowan,Eryn J. Adams,Sabrina Bhangal,Mike Corcoran,Reed Decker,Ciera E. Dockter,Abby T. Eubank,Courtney L. Gann,Nathaniel R. Greene,Ashley C. Helle,Namyeon Lee,Anh T. Nguyen,Kyle R. Ripley,John E. Scofield,Melissa A. Tapia,Katie L. Threlkeld,Ashley L. Watts +16 more
TL;DR: It is argued that humankind can benefit from a better understanding of the cognitive limitations and motivational biases that appear to contribute to arrogance, and three types of arrogance are suggested and six components contributing to them are suggested, each logically related to the next.
The Contribution of Personality and Refugee Camp Experience to Callous and Unemotional Traits Among Immigrant Adolescents in the United States: Implications for the DSM-5 “Limited Prosocial Emotions” Specifier
TL;DR: The results corroborate the importance of considering personality to understand C&U traits and the LPE specifier and raise questions regarding the applicability of C &U traits to non-Western adolescents with varying pre-immigration experiences, and raise the possibility that the L PE specifier is vulnerable to false-positive identifications among such individuals.
What measurement is all about
TL;DR: The nature of psychological measurement is still the subject of fierce controversy as mentioned in this paper, and a rather philosophical debate has been going on in this journal; therefore a closer look at physicists' ideas on measurement may be helpful.
Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman's (1904) "'General intelligence,' objectively determined and measured".
TL;DR: This opening article identifies and then reviews 5 major areas concerning the personological significance of cognitive abilities and the methods used to study them.