Interfaces and interface conditions
Andreas Späth
- 31 Jan 2007
25
TL;DR: The volume comments on different interfaces between linguistic and extralinguistic knowledge by analyzing the conditions under which the linguistic structure of an utterance provides its interpretation in a given context.
read more
Abstract: The volume contains articles that focus on the interface between linguistic and conceptual knowledge. The issues addressed in the volume include the preconditions of every level of the language system that are required for the transformation of linguistic information into conceptual representations. In accordance with Chomsky's Minimalist language model, the language system is embedded into the performative systems where language is a part of the cognitive competence of human beings, i.e. system of articulation and perception (A/P) and the conceptual-intentional system (C/I). During the formation of linguistic structures, every performative system obtains well-formed representations as its input information. The articles of the volume show how interface conditions determine the linguistic representations on each level of the linguistic system. Interface conditions result in requirements for the ordering of linguistic elements. The syntactic transformation achieves a point, where the linguistic structure formation branches to two distinct representational levels. Both levels deliver instructions for the systems of performance A/P and C/I. Linearization takes place on the syntactic surface of a sentence. The linearization of linguistic elements is manifest at the derivational point of Spell-out and also on the level of the phonological form (PF). This means that on the one hand, linearization is relevant to the phonetic aspect of linguistic expressions, and on the other hand, the interpretation of linguistic utterances is based on hierarchical structures. On the level of Logical Form (LF) all operations apply which don't have any influence on the linear order in overt syntax. In addition they affect the generation of hierarchical structures. The structure obtained on LF is the representational format of the semantic form of a sentence.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Prominence vs. aboutness in sequencing: A functional distinction within the left inferior frontal gyrus
TL;DR: The hypothesis that the dissociation between pars opercularis and pars triangularis activation may reflect functional differences between clause-medial and clause-initial word order permutations is examined and is interpreted as evidence for a functional gradation of sequence processing within the left IFG: posterior subportions correlate with argument prominence-based (local) aspects of sequencing, while anterior subportion correlate with aboutness-based aspects ofsequencing.
62
5. Two-level Semantics: Semantic Form and Conceptual Structure
Ewald Lang,Claudia Maienborn +1 more
- 01 Jan 2011
60
What about lexical semantics if syntax is the only generative component of the grammar
TL;DR: The resulting analysis of ambiguous German nominalizations is employed as a probe into the structure and analysis of contained constructions to derive novel insights about the syntax and semantics of adjectival participles in German.
42
Context updating during sentence comprehension: the effect of aboutness topic.
TL;DR: It is argued that these context-induced effects are attributable to reduced processing costs for updating the current discourse model, and support recent approaches of neurocognitive models of discourse processing.
36
Is there a difference between stripy journeys and stripy ladybirds? The N400 response to semantic and world-knowledge violations during sentence processing
TL;DR: The data suggests that the question regarding the distinction between linguistic- and non-linguistic knowledge in terms of language integration remains open, and traditional fractional area and relative criterion measures of peak and onset latencies showed no effect of violation type.
35