Open AccessBook
Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior
Erving Goffman
- 01 Jan 1967
7.6K
TL;DR: Goffman's Interaction Ritual as mentioned in this paper is an interesting account of daily social interaction viewed with a new perspective for the logic of our behavior in such ordinary circumstances as entering a crowded elevator or bus.
read more
Abstract: Not then, men and their moments. Rather, moment and their men, writes Erving Goffman in the introduction to his groundbreaking 1967 Interaction Ritual , a study of face-to-face interaction in natural settings, that class of events which occurs during co-presence and by virtue of co-presence. The ultimate behavioural materials are the glances, gestures, positionings, and verbal statements that people continuously feed into situations, whether intended or not. A sociology of occasions is here advocated. Social organisation is the central theme, but what is organized is the co-mingling of persons and the temporary interactional enterprises that can arise therefrom. A normatively stabilized structure is at issue, a "social gathering", but this is a shifting entity, necessarily evanescent, created by arrivals and killed by departures. The major section of the book is the essay "Where the Action Is", drawing on Goffman's last major ethnographic project observation of Nevada casinos. Tom Burns says of Goffman's work "The eleven books form a singularly compact body of writing. All his published work was devoted to topics and themes which were closely connected, and the methodology, angles of approach and of course style of writing remained characteristically his own throughout. Interaction Ritual in particular is an interesting account of daily social interaction viewed with a new perspective for the logic of our behavior in such ordinary circumstances as entering a crowded elevator or bus." In his new introduction, Joel Best considers Goffman's work in toto and places Interaction Ritual in that total context as one of Goffman's pivotal works: oHis subject matter was unique. In sharp contrast to the natural tendency of many scholars to tackle big, important topics, Goffman was a minimalist, working on a small scale, and concentrating on the most mundane, ordinary social contacts, on everyday life.o
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
A Sociology of Luck
TL;DR: The authors argue that this omission is, in fact, an oversight and argue that an explicit and systematic engagement with luck provides a good starting point for a more systematic exploration of the concept of luck.
51
The selfie and the transformation of the public–private distinction
TL;DR: The selfie is a contemporary form of self-portraiture, representing a photographic image of the human face as mentioned in this paper, which is created for the purpose of reproduction and to communicate images visually with others from a distance.
Criticizing another’s child: How teachers evaluate students during parent-teacher conferences
TL;DR: The authors examines a diverse corpus of video-recorded naturally occurring conferences to elucidate a structural preference organization operative during parent-teacher interaction that enables participants to forestall conflict and demonstrate that teachers do extra interactional work when articulating student-criticism.
51
“ ‘Schwedis’ he can’t even say Swedish” - subverting and reproducing institutionalized norms for language use in multilingual peer groups
06 Jul 2022
TL;DR: In this article , the authors explored how minority schoolchildren in multilingual peer group interactions act upon dominant educational and linguistic ideologies as they organize their everyday emerging peer culture, and argued that such forms of playful heteroglossic peer group practices are highly ambiguous and paradoxically tend to enforce power hierarchies and values associated with different social languages and codes, thus co-constructing the monolingual ideology.
Reliability of the Force Factor Method in Police Use-of-Force Research
Matthew J. Hickman,Loren T. Atherley,Patrick G. Lowery,Geoffrey P. Alpert,Geoffrey P. Alpert +4 more
TL;DR: The reliability of the force factor method has yet to be intensively studied as mentioned in this paper, but the use of force factor has garnered much attention and application in police use-of-force research.
50
Related Papers (5)
Erving Goffman
- 01 Jan 1959
Penelope Brown,Stephen C. Levinson +1 more
- 01 Jan 1987
Erving Goffman
- 01 Jan 1974