Open AccessPosted Content
Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance
Douglass C. North,John Alt +1 more
26.6K
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the role that institutions, defined as the humanly devised constraints that shape human interaction, play in economic performance and how those institutions change and how a model of dynamic institutions explains the differential performance of economies through time.
read more
Abstract: Examines the role that institutions, defined as the humanly devised constraints that shape human interaction, play in economic performance and how those institutions change and how a model of dynamic institutions explains the differential performance of economies through time. Institutions are separate from organizations, which are assemblages of people directed to strategically operating within institutional constraints. Institutions affect the economy by influencing, together with technology, transaction and production costs. They do this by reducing uncertainty in human interaction, albeit not always efficiently. Entrepreneurs accomplish incremental changes in institutions by perceiving opportunities to do better through altering the institutional framework of political and economic organizations. Importantly, the ability to perceive these opportunities depends on both the completeness of information and the mental constructs used to process that information. Thus, institutions and entrepreneurs stand in a symbiotic relationship where each gives feedback to the other. Neoclassical economics suggests that inefficient institutions ought to be rapidly replaced. This symbiotic relationship helps explain why this theoretical consequence is often not observed: while this relationship allows growth, it also allows inefficient institutions to persist. The author identifies changes in relative prices and prevailing ideas as the source of institutional alterations. Transaction costs, however, may keep relative price changes from being fully exploited. Transaction costs are influenced by institutions and institutional development is accordingly path-dependent. (CAR)
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
New! Improved? The Transformation of the Global Agrifood System*
Lawrence Busch,Carmen Bain +1 more
TL;DR: The authors argued that the new global rules, regulations, and institutions implemented by the World Trade Organization have facilitated the ability of the private agrifood sector to consolidate and expand internation- ally.
Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: evidence from research and development projects within the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) industry
TL;DR: Empirical results show that geographical, organizational and institutional proximity favour collaborations, while cognitive and social proximity do not play a significant role.
Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China's transitional economy
TL;DR: In this paper, the economic payoff of kinship networks in the context of China's rural industrialization was analyzed and it was shown that kin solidarity and kin trust played an important role in protecting the property rights of private entrepreneurs and reducing transaction costs during early stages of market reform.
481
•Book
Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions
Johann Peter Murmann
- 06 Aug 2009
TL;DR: The authors reviewed two books that analyse the dynamic interaction between the business environments and business strategies in very different ways, focusing on the co-evolutionary processes between national innovation systems, business strategies, and performance.
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Berkeley Hill,Alan Greer,Thomas Heckelei,Peter Witze +3 more
- 01 Jan 2004
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on the role of agriculture and fishing in the European level in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and show that agriculture dominates in terms of direct contribution to GDP and numbers of people engaged in it, as well as accounting for the largest amount of public support expenditure.
478