Open AccessPosted Content
Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance
Douglass C. North,John Alt +1 more
26.6K
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the role that institutions, defined as the humanly devised constraints that shape human interaction, play in economic performance and how those institutions change and how a model of dynamic institutions explains the differential performance of economies through time.
read more
Abstract: Examines the role that institutions, defined as the humanly devised constraints that shape human interaction, play in economic performance and how those institutions change and how a model of dynamic institutions explains the differential performance of economies through time. Institutions are separate from organizations, which are assemblages of people directed to strategically operating within institutional constraints. Institutions affect the economy by influencing, together with technology, transaction and production costs. They do this by reducing uncertainty in human interaction, albeit not always efficiently. Entrepreneurs accomplish incremental changes in institutions by perceiving opportunities to do better through altering the institutional framework of political and economic organizations. Importantly, the ability to perceive these opportunities depends on both the completeness of information and the mental constructs used to process that information. Thus, institutions and entrepreneurs stand in a symbiotic relationship where each gives feedback to the other. Neoclassical economics suggests that inefficient institutions ought to be rapidly replaced. This symbiotic relationship helps explain why this theoretical consequence is often not observed: while this relationship allows growth, it also allows inefficient institutions to persist. The author identifies changes in relative prices and prevailing ideas as the source of institutional alterations. Transaction costs, however, may keep relative price changes from being fully exploited. Transaction costs are influenced by institutions and institutional development is accordingly path-dependent. (CAR)
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
The multinationalization of developing country MNEs: The case of multilatinas
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors study the decision to establish foreign direct investment (FDI) of developing country firms, in particular Latin American ones or “Multilatinas”.
336
Identifying the big question in international business research
TL;DR: The authors argued that the IB research agenda is not likely to run out of steam, because focusing on this question will leverage IB's comparative advantage and keep the field engaged in generating exciting and disciplined theories and findings in the 21st century.
The Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investments: Empirical Evidence and Methodological Challenges
Bo Bernhard Nielsen,Bo Bernhard Nielsen,Christian Geisler Asmussen,Cecilie Dohlmann Weatherall +3 more
TL;DR: The authors reviewed and evaluated 153 quantitative studies on FDI location choice over four decades from 1976 to 2015 across multiple disciplines, including international business, management, economics, urban and regional studies, and economic geography.
335
Future governance of innovation policy in Europe — three scenarios
TL;DR: In this paper, a set of hypotheses concerning the co-evolution of "political systems" and "innovation systems" in Europe are discussed. But the authors focus on the future governance of innovation policies, trying to pave the way for empirical analyses.
335
Formal Institutions, Culture, and Venture Capital Activity: A Cross-Country Analysis
Yong Li,Shaker A. Zahra +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors suggest that the variation in the level of venture capital activity can be attributed to the different levels of formal institutional development and propose that venture capitalists respond differently to the incentives provided by formal institutions depending on different cultural settings.
334