Journal Article10.2307/41409970
Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review
TL;DR: An interdisciplinary review of privacy-related research is provided in order to enable a more cohesive treatment and recommends that researchers be alert to an overarching macro model that is referred to as APCO (Antecedents → Privacy Concerns → Outcomes).
read more
Abstract: To date, many important threads of information privacy research have developed, but these threads have not been woven together into a cohesive fabric. This paper provides an interdisciplinary review of privacy-related research in order to enable a more cohesive treatment. With a sample of 320 privacy articles and 128 books and book sections, we classify previous literature in two ways: (1) using an ethics-based nomenclature of normative, purely descriptive, and empirically descriptive, and (2) based on their level of analysis: individual, group, organizational, and societal.
Based upon our analyses via these two classification approaches, we identify three major areas in which previous research contributions reside: the conceptualization of information privacy, the relationship between information privacy and other constructs, and the contextual nature of these relationships.
As we consider these major areas, we draw three overarching conclusions. First, there are many theoretical developments in the body of normative and purely descriptive studies that have not been addressed in empirical research on privacy. Rigorous studies that either trace processes associated with, or test implied assertions from, these value-laden arguments could add great value. Second, some of the levels of analysis have received less attention in certain contexts than have others in the research to date. Future empirical studies-both positivist and interpretive--could profitably be targeted to these under-researched levels of analysis. Third, positivist empirical studies will add the greatest value if they focus on antecedents to privacy concerns and on actual outcomes. In that light, we recommend that researchers be alert to an overarching macro model that we term APCO (Antecedents → Privacy Concerns → Outcomes).
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: a cross-sectional systematic assessment
TL;DR: Systematic gaps in compliance with data protection principles in accredited health apps question whether certification programs relying substantially on developer disclosures can provide a trusted resource for patients and clinicians.
•Posted Content
State of the Information Privacy Literature: Where are We Now and Where Should We Go?
TL;DR: This paper evaluates the current state of the IS literature on information privacy (where are the authors now?) and identifies promising research directions for advancing IS research on information Privacy (where should they go?).
381
Availability and quality of mobile health app privacy policies
TL;DR: The findings show that currently mHealth developers often fail to provide app privacy policies, and the privacy policies that are available do not make information privacy practices transparent to users, require college-level literacy, and are often not focused on the app itself.
378
Theories in online information privacy research: A critical review and an integrated framework
Yuan Li
- 01 Dec 2012
TL;DR: This study reviews fifteen established theories in online information privacy research and recognizes the primary contributions and connections of the theories and develops an integrated framework for further research.
369
Health information privacy concerns, antecedents, and information disclosure intention in online health communities
TL;DR: The perceived health status differentially moderates the effects of privacy concerns and informational support on the PHI disclosure intention, which significantly influence personal health information (PHI) disclosure intention.
363
References
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
J. R. Landis,Gary G. Koch +1 more
TL;DR: A general statistical methodology for the analysis of multivariate categorical data arising from observer reliability studies is presented and tests for interobserver bias are presented in terms of first-order marginal homogeneity and measures of interob server agreement are developed as generalized kappa-type statistics.
76.1K
•Book
Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research
Martin Fishbein,Icek Ajzen +1 more
- 01 Jun 1975
43.1K
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Arndt Sorge,Geert Hofstede +1 more
TL;DR: In his book Culture's Consequences, Geert Hofstede proposed four dimensions on which the differences among national cultures can be understood: Individualism, Power Distance, Uncertainty Avoidance and Masculinity.
20.7K
•Book
Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values
Geert Hofstede
- 01 Nov 1980
TL;DR: In his book Culture's Consequences, Geert Hofstede proposed four dimensions on which the differences among national cultures can be understood: Individualism, Power Distance, Uncertainty Avoidance and Masculinity as mentioned in this paper.
19.8K
Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship
danah boyd,Nicole B. Ellison +1 more
TL;DR: This publication contains reprint articles for which IEEE does not hold copyright and which are likely to be copyrighted.
17.6K