Individual Causal Inference Using Panel Data With Multiple Outcomes
Wei-Hua Tian
- 03 Jun 2023
TL;DR: This article proposed a method based on the interactive fixed effects model to estimate treatment effects at the individual level, which allows both the treatment assignment and the potential outcomes to be correlated with the unobserved individual characteristics.
read more
Abstract: Policy evaluation in empirical microeconomics has been focusing on estimating the average treatment effect and more recently the heterogeneous treatment effects, often relying on the unconfoundedness assumption. We propose a method based on the interactive fixed effects model to estimate treatment effects at the individual level, which allows both the treatment assignment and the potential outcomes to be correlated with the unobserved individual characteristics. This method is suitable for panel datasets where multiple related outcomes are observed for a large number of individuals over a small number of time periods. Monte Carlo simulations show that our method outperforms related methods. To illustrate our method, we provide an example of estimating the effect of health insurance coverage on individual usage of hospital emergency departments using the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment data.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
References
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
TL;DR: The authors discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies and shows that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates.
Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.
TL;DR: A discussion of matching, randomization, random sampling, and other methods of controlling extraneous variation is presented in this paper, where the objective is to specify the benefits of randomization in estimating causal effects of treatments.
10.2K
Automobile prices in market equilibrium
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed techniques for empirically analyzing demand and supply in differentiated products markets and then applied these techniques to analyze equilibrium in the U.S. automobile industry.
Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data
TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider estimation and testing of vector autoregressio n coefficients in panel data, and apply the techniques to analyze the dynamic relationships between wages an d hours worked in two samples of American males.
4.5K
Panel Data Models With Interactive Fixed Effects
TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider large N and large T panel data models with unobservable multiple interactive eects and derive the rate of convergence and the limiting distribution of the interactive-eect s estimator of the common slope coecients.
1.7K