Journal Article10.48550/arXiv.2209.14375
Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgements
A. Glaese,Nathan McAleese,Maja Trkebacz,John Aslanides,Vlad Firoiu,Timo Ewalds,Maribeth Rauh,Laura Weidinger,Martin Chadwick,Phoebe Thacker,Lucy Campbell-Gillingham,Jonathan Uesato,Po-Sen Huang,Ramona Comanescu,Fan Yang,Abigail See,Sumanth Dathathri,Rory Greig,Charlie Chen,Doug Fritz,Jaume Sanchez Elias,Richard Green,Sona Mokra,Nicholas Fernando,Boxi Wu,Rachel Foley,Susannah Young,Iason Gabriel,William S. Isaac,John F. J. Mellor,Demis Hassabis,Koray Kavukcuoglu,Lisa Anne Hendricks,Geoffrey Irving +33 more
349
TL;DR: This research presents a state-of-the-art knowledge graph depicting the architecture of the connective tissue of the autonomic nervous system and some of the mechanisms responsible for seizure and depression are described.
read more
Abstract: We present Sparrow, an information-seeking dialogue agent trained to be more helpful, correct, and harmless compared to prompted language model baselines. We use reinforcement learning from human feedback to train our models with two new additions to help human raters judge agent behaviour. First, to make our agent more helpful and harmless, we break down the requirements for good dialogue into natural language rules the agent should follow, and ask raters about each rule separately. We demonstrate that this breakdown enables us to collect more targeted human judgements of agent behaviour and allows for more efficient rule-conditional reward models. Second, our agent provides evidence from sources supporting factual claims when collecting preference judgements over model statements. For factual questions, evidence provided by Sparrow supports the sampled response 78% of the time. Sparrow is preferred more often than baselines while being more resilient to adversarial probing by humans, violating our rules only 8% of the time when probed. Finally, we conduct extensive analyses showing that though our model learns to follow our rules it can exhibit distributional biases.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Foundational Moral Values for AI Alignment
Betty Hou,Brian Patrick Green +1 more
TL;DR: Five core, foundational values, drawn from moral philosophy and built on the requisites for human existence, are presented, showing that these values not only provide a clearer direction for technical alignment work, but also serve as a framework to highlight threats and opportunities from AI systems to both obtain and sustain these values.
Ensemble reverse knowledge distillation: training robust model using weak models
Christopher Gavra Reswara,Tjeng Wawan Cenggoro,Christopher Gavra Reswara,Tjeng Wawan Cenggoro +3 more
Abstract: To ensure that artificial intelligence (AI) can be aligned with humans, AI models need to be developed and supervised by humans. Unfortunately, it is possible for an AI to exceed human capabilities, which is commonly referred to as superalignment models. Thus, it raised the question of whether humans can still supervise a superalignment model, which is encapsulated in a concept called weak-to-strong generalization. To address this issue, we introduce ensemble reverse knowledge distillation (ERKD), which leverages two weaker models to supervise a more robust model. This technique is a potential solution for humans to manage a super-alignment of models. ERKD enables a more robust model to achieve optimal performance with the assistance of two weaker models. We tried to train a more robust EfficientNet model with weaker convolutional neural network (CNN) models in a supervised fashion. With this method, the EfficientNet model performed better than the model trained with the standard transfer learning (STL) method. It also performed better than a model that was supervised by a single weaker model. Finally, ERKD-trained EfficientNet models can perform better than EfficientNet models that are one or even two levels stronger.
Towards Better Instruction Following Language Models for Chinese: Investigating the Impact of Training Data and Evaluation
TL;DR: This article examined the influence of training data factors, including quantity, quality, and linguistic distribution, on model performance and provided valuable insights for the continued advancement of open-source chat models.
Right, No Matter Why: AI Fact-checking and AI Authority in Health-related Inquiry Settings
Elena Sergeeva,Anastasia Sergeeva,Huiyun Tang,Kerstin Bongard-Blanchy,Peter Szolovits +4 more
TL;DR: An exploratory evaluation of users' AI-advice accepting behavior when evaluating the truthfulness of a health-related statement in different advice quality settings finds that even feedback that is confined to just stating that "the AI thinks that the statement is false/true" results in more than half of people moving their statement veracity assessment towards the AI suggestion.
COLD-Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs with Stealthiness and Controllability
Xing-ming Guo,Fangxu Yu,Huan Zhang,Lianhui Qin,Bin Hu +4 more
TL;DR: The Energy-based Constrained Decoding with Langevin Dynamics (COLD) is adapted, and the COLD-Attack framework is introduced which unifies and automates the search of adversarial LLM attacks under a variety of control requirements such as fluency, stealthiness, sentiment, and left-right-coherence.
References
•Proceedings Article
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Diederik P. Kingma,Jimmy Ba +1 more
- 01 Jan 2015
TL;DR: This work introduces Adam, an algorithm for first-order gradient-based optimization of stochastic objective functions, based on adaptive estimates of lower-order moments, and provides a regret bound on the convergence rate that is comparable to the best known results under the online convex optimization framework.
138.5K
•Book
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Richard S. Sutton,Andrew G. Barto +1 more
- 01 Jan 1988
TL;DR: This book provides a clear and simple account of the key ideas and algorithms of reinforcement learning, which ranges from the history of the field's intellectual foundations to the most recent developments and applications.
•Proceedings Article
Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning
Volodymyr Mnih,Adrià Puigdomènech Badia,Mehdi Mirza,Alex Graves,Tim Harley,Timothy P. Lillicrap,David Silver,Koray Kavukcuoglu +7 more
- 19 Jun 2016
TL;DR: A conceptually simple and lightweight framework for deep reinforcement learning that uses asynchronous gradient descent for optimization of deep neural network controllers and shows that asynchronous actor-critic succeeds on a wide variety of continuous motor control problems as well as on a new task of navigating random 3D mazes using a visual input.
Logic and Conversation
Siobhan Chapman
- 01 Jan 2005
TL;DR: For instance, Grice was interested in Quine's logical approach to language, although he differed from Quine over certain specific specific questions, such as the viability of the distinction between analytic and synthetic statements.
8.9K
The case for motivated reasoning.
TL;DR: It is proposed that motivation may affect reasoning through reliance on a biased set of cognitive processes--that is, strategies for accessing, constructing, and evaluating beliefs--that are considered most likely to yield the desired conclusion.